The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Stockpiles

Submitted By garyb11
Words: 559
Pages: 3
Open Document
Nuclear stockpiles have the ability to destroy the world we live in within a matter of seconds due to a single rational decision made by an individual. The mistake one person could make has the ability to cost us all our lives and there is not much we can do to prevent it since so many countries posses them. The fact that so many countries have vast amounts of nuclear stockpiles raises the question upon whether or not we should even have them. When you truly think about it you realize that these nuclear weapons can do no good but only cause serious harm. Not to mention the insane amount of money being spent on useless weapons that more often than not end up going to waste. The money being spent on harmful weapons could most definitely benefit people in other ways which is why these countries have such a difficult time justifying the reason behind building these nuclear weapons. The way they handle the discussion of nuclear weapons goes to prove how pointless these stockpiles truly are.

For starters, many countries still possess these nuclear weapons for no apparent reason since many countries are not even in jeopardy where these nuclear weapons could,in a sense, help them feel more safe. Of course Russia and the United States lead the group with Russia possessing 8,500 where as the United States hold 7,700. Out of all the countries we would expect these two to be the ones leading the way but not at such a large amount. France has considerably less stockpiles as they have 300 while China has 250 and the United Kingdom have 225. These three countries are around the same margin which is not too surprising to see. However, Pakistan reportedly has 120 and India has 110 which seems to be unexpectedly high for them. Israel was said to be in the mix of having nuclear weapons but as it turns out they actually possess 80. For a country that was only to be suspected of having a few, that is extremely high. North Korea on the other hand was suspected to have several nuclear weapons as that number still
Show More

Related Documents: The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Stockpiles

Essay on Nuclear Weapons

A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion. Both reactions release vast quantities of energy from relatively small amounts of matter. The first fission bomb test released the same amount of energy as approximately 20,000 tons of TNT. The first thermonuclear bomb test released the same amount of energy as approximately 10,000,000 tons of TNT. A thermonuclear weapon weighing little more…

Words 1951 - Pages 8

The Importance Of Nuclear Weapons

Weber I believe we should continue to build our nuclear power because it helps protect us from rogue countries, nuclear proliferation is unavoidable and nukes in the hands of more states stops the chances of war I believe “Hook”- With everyone else gaining weapons why change our ways and not be first? Background info-With 8 countries having nuclear weapons and China quickly gaining power in economics we should continue to build nuclear weapons. Thesis- While we’ve broken countless acts because…

Words 493 - Pages 2

Nuclear Weapons Essay

Cold War, nukes are still an ongoing experiment. Nowadays it seems that the nuclear crisis has only gotten worse. With the thousands of terrorist groups and several rogue countries capable of making the bomb, the horrific threat of total world destruction has only been heightened. Many people have tried to put this conflict into perspective. There are many plausible paths one can take in arguing for or against possessing nuclear missiles. A great point is made by Graham Allison, a professor of government…

Words 1517 - Pages 7

The Importance Of Nuclear Weapons

obsolescence (both imaginative and doctrinal) of nuclear forces is difficult to achieve. Fears of humanitarian disaster, nuclear winter, failure of deterrence and nuclear accidents do not provide a tangible enough cause for the nuclear strategic community, or even atomic publics at large, to transform what are now traditional notions of strength and power. Nuclear weapons are a currency of hard power. Can the strategic community in countries possessing nuclear weapons be disincentivised to stop placing the…

Words 472 - Pages 2

1960s Nuclear Weapons

The advent of nuclear weaponry and the continued development and improvement of nuclear weapons technology inexorably shaped relations between the United States and the Soviet Union in the 1950s and the 1960s. The introduction of nuclear weapons and the rampant expansion of nuclear arsenals emerged as destabilizing components of the tenuous Cold War relationship. Simultaneously, nuclear weapons functioned as mechanisms to sustain peaceful coexistence among the superpowers. An analysis of this period…

Words 1341 - Pages 6

Nuclear Weapons In The 1940s

worried about the Nazi research on nuclear weapons. In 1940 the U.S. government started funding its own atomic weapons development program. The Manhattan project turned the war around, although the Japanese were on the break of surrender. In the 1940s American technology affected the world. A group of scientists, many of them refugees became concerned with nuclear weapon research in Nazi Germany. Shortly after the U.S. government started its own atomic weapons research program. Code name “The Manhattan…

Words 391 - Pages 2

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

modernizing everyday and we are witnessing a technological advancement in every field there is, nuclear weapons are not left behind. Unfortunately, there are countries working everyday and investing most of their money, citizens etc… into developing deadlier nuclear weapons than its neighboring country. People are completely aware about the havoc, a nuclear weapon can cause, Calls for a nuclear-weapon–free world are not new. Indeed, efforts by so many international activists and communities in the…

Words 722 - Pages 3

Hiroshima: Nuclear Weapon Essay

Nuclear weapons create a false sense of security among the general public. Countries boast and brag at the destructive power potential of their newly manufactured weapons of mass destruction all while creating the illusion that theses weapons were created for their protection. A war can not be initiated without a provoking force and can not be concluded without a victor. Someone is destined to win. This is what makes nuclear war a bone chilling and utterly terrifying concept. Nuclear weapons…

Words 787 - Pages 4

The German Nuclear Weapon Project Essay

figures in Ernest Rutherford’s circle, although his first fame dates from work performed even before their meeting. Early in the twentieth century he became a pioneer in radiochemistry. His long and notable career lasted through the discovery of nuclear fission to the study of fission fragments and to the rebirth of German science following World War II. His father, Heinrich Hahn, was descended from Rhenish peasant stock, but he was disinclined to follow the family tradition of farming. Instead,…

Words 963 - Pages 4

Essay on Analysis of Iranian Nuclear Weapons Research

to persuade them to curtail it’s nuclear weapons ambitions (Herszenhorn, Negotiators Find in Kazakhstan the Perfect Place to Disagree 2013) Two days later, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced on national television, “Iran has already become a nuclear country and no one is capable of stealing this title.” Iran maintains that its nuclear pursuits are for energy and medical purposes while members of the Security Council accuse it of seeking nuclear weapons. (Herszenhorn, After Talks End,…

Words 1352 - Pages 6