Obedience Essay

Submitted By claudiatiramanixo
Words: 1272
Pages: 6
Open Document
Society’s Tendency to Pass on Responsibility

The Obedience to Authority Experiment of Stanley Milgram is one of the most studied experiments in American history due to its wide-ranging social implications. The study gained popular attention because it aimed to provide some insight as to why the Holocaust had escalated in such a way. The study was designed around testing the degree of inflicted pain strangers would give to others, under orders by an experimenter. Not only did the study defy what others predict would happen, but it clearly unmasked the immorality of human judgment under the obedience of a fellow partner. In Milgram’s follow-up paper titled, “The Perils of Obedience”, he outlined the results, which point to the fact that relatively few people have the mental resources needed to resist authority. This paper will outline the setup of the experiment and follow up with the results and finally the social implications of such a study.
The experiment, which began in 1961, was designed in order to provide justifications as to why there were so many accomplices in the events of the Holocaust. Less than a year after the trial of a famous Nazi war criminal (Eichmann), finding out the main social driver behind the Holocaust was of importance in the world agenda. Milgram (1974) wrote in “The Perils of Obedience”, "[C]ould it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" Milgram (1963) wanted to investigate whether ordinary Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II. The study was designed in a way to see to what extent ordinary people can be turned to commit atrocities through obedience.
The study setup involved using a participant acting as a teacher, the experimenter and a confederate “learner” who was introduced as an ordinary man to the participant. The study worked by having a participant (the teacher) administer increasing levels of shocks to a learner (who was actually acting the pain) whenever he would mistake a phrase the participant attempted to teach. The experimenter effectively urged the participant to continue shocking the “learner” despite the learner crying for it to stop. The experimenter used a series of prompts, such as, “It is absolutely essential that you continue”, in order to entice the participant to continue. The setup of the study came under criticism that the participants may become psychologically broken because of “inflicted insight”, which is when a study unmasks something that is wrong with the participant. Regardless the study was redone multiple times to ensure quality.
The results of this experiment were controversial and unexpected. 65% of the participants in the study ended up “shocking” the actor at the full intensity 450 volts. Everyone else made it up to 300 volts before stopping. Some potential faults in the study sprang up as criticism. Firstly, the experimenter may have used more than 4 prompts at times in order to entice the participants to continue. Also, participants may have realized during the process that the study was too intense to be real. In the original published paper Milgram wrote how, “every participant paused and questioned the experiment; some said they would refund the money they were paid for participating in the experiment. Throughout the experiment, subjects displayed varying degrees of tension and stress. Subjects were sweating, trembling, stuttering, biting their lips, groaning, digging their fingernails into their skin, and some were even having nervous laughing fits or seizures” (Milgram, 1963). The results of the study showed how easily people could be turned into agents of terror.
Milgram’s conclusions on the study pointed to the fact that ordinary people can become part of a terrible destructive process because they do not have the moral power to resist authority. Although most people
Show More

Related Documents: Obedience Essay

Obedience Paper

The Discoveries of Obedience Obedience; what does the word really mean? According to Griggs (2012), “Obedience is following the commands of a persons authority”(p.331). A psychologist named Milgram decided to take obedience deeper and studied it from the history to his basic discoveries and later results. Taking a look back at history for example, “My Lai Massacre, where soldiers were ordered to shoot the innocent villagers, including children, women and the elderly”(Griggs 2012). This is a prime…

Words 625 - Pages 3

Perils Of Obedience

have been as bad as it was. The people who obey the authority no matter what may feel it is wrong to disobey them no matter the situation they see is occurring or perhaps even a situation that is happening to them. In an article, “The Perils of Obedience,” by Stanley Milgram a social psychologist, argues even that people will listen to their authority even if it means they have to hurt others. In the article Milgram talks about an experiment that was conducted in which their was the experimenter…

Words 1466 - Pages 6

Obedience In The Odyssey

following them. Deuteronomy twenty-seven and twenty-eight reemphasize and reestablish the Law of Moses which was introduced in Exodus twenty. The key idea to this covenant is that if Yahweh’s people obey him, he will bless them. In other words, with obedience comes blessings. This theme is carried out throughout the books of Kings. King Ahab, the seventh king of the northern kingdom of Israel, is considered one of the worst kings. He reigned for twenty-two years and was more evil than all who came before…

Words 1081 - Pages 5

Milgram's Obedience Experiment

their behavior due to a request from a group. On the other hand, obedience is a person changes their behavior to fit an "authority figure" (Ciccarelli , 453). Milgram's Obedience experiment is built by Milgram to test obedience. He set some to be "teachers" and others to be "learner". "Learner" was actually an actor, and he gave an authority to "teachers" to shock "learner" if they were incorrect on a simple test. Milgram's Obedience experiment is viewed as controversial these days because it reveals…

Words 493 - Pages 2

Essay on Conformity and Obedience

Conformity and Obedience Task: outline and evaluate findings from conformity and obedience research and consider explanations for conformity (and non-conformity), as well as evaluating Milgram’s studies of obedience (including ethical issues). The following essay will be about understanding what is meant by and distinguishing the differences between the terms conformity and obedience. It will show the evaluation of two key psychological studies which seek to explain why people do and do not conform…

Words 3311 - Pages 14

Conformity And Obedience Essay

Conformity and Obedience The term Social Influence is used to describe what happens when an individual’s opinions, behaviours of emotions are affected or changed due to the influences of another person or persons. This might be Normative Social Influence or Informational Social Influence. Normative often results in compliance as people often put their own opinions to one side and go along with the majority whereas informational could well be minority led, as it is based on an informed point of view…

Words 837 - Pages 4

Evaluation Obedience Essay

Evaluation points: Explanations of Obedience Agentic state Milgram’s participants knew it was wrong but put the responsibility on the experimenter At the Nuremberg Trials many Nazis said they were just following orders It explains why some people do not obey – they have stayed in the autonomous state A weakness is that there is no evidence that this shift takes place and it cannot be measured. The theory is vague and does not explain fully why or how the shift takes place. One way in…

Words 464 - Pages 2

Conformity and Obedience Essay

Conformity and Obedience Why do we conform? Two basic sources of influence: normative social influence, the need to be liked, accepted by others and Informational influence: need to be correct and to behave in accordance with reality. Solomon Asch (1956) devised an experiment to see if subjects would conform even if they were uncertain that the group norm was incorrect. In his study he asked subjects to take part in an experiment. They were each asked to match a standard length line with three…

Words 2543 - Pages 11

Obedience Experiment Report

Dear Mr Baddeley, I am writing in response to your letter of complaint about my obedience experiment. I feel that I have done nothing wrong I would like to convince you that I have in no way ashamed the BPS. Firstly, my work was of practical value as it showed that individuals have a tendency towards destructive obedience. I believe that by showing the results of this experiment, it would have wider benefits to society as it could avoid such incidents in the future, as the one which triggered my…

Words 574 - Pages 3

Conformity And Consequences Of Obedience

Obedience is compliance with an order, request, or law or submission to another authority. It is behavior that is mindful and respectful of rules and laws. Conformity is a change in behavior or beliefs as a result of real or imagined group pressure. We naturally conform to the “norm of society”. Obedience and Conformity are two of the most common types of human behavior. We normally obey our parent’s, authority figures, and rules/laws. The motivation to obey comes from either wanting to be rewarded…

Words 411 - Pages 2