SGM Carole Puskedra
United States Army Sergeants major Academy
Class 40
SGM John Drawbond – Class 40 facilitator 13 Nov 2013
Abstract
This paper on Leadership will compare the primary differences and characteristics between the tactical leader and the organizational leader. I will provide you with the basics for development, characteristics, and the fundamentals that help guide and influence each leader’s style and how they influence Soldiers to follow them. Leaders at all levels demonstrate their values, knowledge, skills, and abilities in many different means and methods in …show more content…
Leaders must be confident in themselves before they can effectively lead Soldiers and manage units. With any leadership style, the focus is mission success, which in turn, helps us remain a relevant, ready, trained, and cohesive force.
Leadership means many things, while researching what the true meaning of what leadership means to me, I came across a quote from: Orit Gadiesh (1997) who points out that in order:
To achieve excellence, you must stick to your own True North - your own core principles and values. If you do, it will guide you as you make decisions on the margin. It will give you the courage to always find the truth, look it square in the eye and stick to it even when it is hard. If you use and project the power that comes with convictions, then no matter what you face, you will be unique and remarkable. (Adrain, p. 36.)
Tactical Leadership Tactical Leader’s are war-fighting leaders who lead by how we will get to the end state, no matter the consequences. Tactical leaders tend to make decisions based off the here and now and how it relates to future events of the world. Their motivation is chaotic, unorganized in their demands, structure and communication, but still, the end result seems to be a fully prepared and trained readiness of the unit at all levels, no matter the sacrifices they put on Soldiers, or family members. The tactical leader leads by example; their thoughts, their