The additional training was very brief, and easy to implement into the schedules of the HCP’s. Also, this approach was not intrusive in any way to the practitioners, and was able to provide information in return that was relevant and timely to the researchers (Grinnell et al., 2016). This outcome based evaluation was successful in determining this brief thirty-minute training module was effective and helpful; many of the participants reported an increase in not only their knowledge of second hand smoke, but also in their ability to address this topic with their clients in a non-judgmental manner (Jones & Mcewen, …show more content…
The exact questions were not listed in the study as they had three different versions in order to reduce the possibility of the participants sharing answers and contaminating the study (Jones & Mcewen, 2015). The hypothesis was based on evidence from a previous study that showed additional training in the areas where HCP’s felt they were lacking, both improved their level of confidence and their ability to effectively address the issue of second hand smoke with their clients (Jones & Mcewen, 2015). The first couple areas the questions covered seemed to be common knowledge to the HCP’s; however, the last areas would seem to give the researchers the most information in regards to the amount of knowledge and confidence each participant gained from the training. Those questions dealt with the client’s reactions to the topic being addressed and on giving advice on changes that could be made to help their client (Jones & Mcewen,