Maintaining the visual elements of Cubism and Suprematism and some of the Dada, De Stijl pursue the visual artists in using the ideal geometric forms and in range of artistic influences and media. Their intention was to develop in a new creative way to not only use fine and applied arts but also react to other art forms such as architecture, urban planning, industrial design, typography, music and poetry.
With the confusion of World War I, the aesthetic and perception were defined as a large response that the movement members were searching the means indicating the sense of order and harmony in the new nation. …show more content…
In Mondrian work, there is the sense of vertical and horizontal lines being used while in Huszár work he is benefiting from the horizontal lines. When compared to Piet's work, Huszár work has more flow and its asymmetrical then Piet's work in the sense of lines. Were as in Piet's work, it has a sample of the symmetrical work but comparing it to Huszár work, I think it more symmetrical and aligned. Piet is using the means of bold lines so that there is contrast between the colours epically were there is the same colour being used next to each other. What they have in common is that they are both sharing the same colour scheme; Blue, Yellow, Red and Black of De