Pinto: Ford Pinto and Automobile Company Ford Essay

Submitted By yaru-hu
Words: 563
Pages: 3
Open Document
Abstract
The Ford Pinto case occurred in the 1970s. Famous automobile company Ford designed a new model, and named “Pinto”. Due to its stylish appearance and reasonable price, the Ford Pinto quickly became a popular model.
However, the public has raised a lot of questions about the safety of the car. One of the fatal question is that the car’s gas tank has design flaws. And there is evidence that in case of Pinto suffer a rear-end collision, the gas tank is easily punctured by bolts on the differential, causing a serious accident.
Issue
Should a cost-benefit analysis be used in this situations where a defect in design could lead to death or seriously bodily harm?
Identify Stakeholders
The Ford Motor Company and manager should be confronted with this issue.
The victims and their families and millions of workers are being impacted by the issue.
RULE
The prosecutor of Elkhart County, Indiana chose to prosecute the Ford Motor Company for reckless homicide and criminal recklessness. Eventually, Ford's appeal was dismissed, $ 3.5 million in punitive damages verdict was approved and constitutes product liability case.
ANALYSIS
The Ford Motor company defended itself on the grounds that it used the accepted cost-benefit analysis to determine if the monetary costs of making the change were greater than the societal benefit. At first, ford estimates that due to design flaws, Pinto car could cause 180 deaths and 180 people burned, and plus 2100 cars burned. Accordance with the prevailing price of the standard of life, Ford needs to average paid $ 200,000 per death, burns $ 67,000 each, plus a burned car Pinto, Ford expects to pay $ 49.5 million. However, this seemingly high cost of risk was stabilized by another calculation. Ford calculated that if recall 12.5 million vehicles Pinto all (just $ 11 each) to increase safety device, it would require $ 137.5 million. In comparison, the Ford Motor Company concluded that increasing the cost of safety devices beyond maintaining the safety of motorists earnings. Therefore, the company gave up the recall program.
I think on the one hand, if Ford company do not apply cost-benefit analysis, they will ultimately fail because they can not be profitable.
Show More

Related Documents: Pinto: Ford Pinto and Automobile Company Ford Essay

Patrice Brown Utilitarian First Paper Ford Pinto

Business Ethics MGMT 368 10 February 2015 The Ford Pinto Case The Ford Pinto Case was a very infamous moment in Ford’s history. At that time, Ford was struggling to keep up with the ever rising imports of Japanese auto manufacturers that were being produced and sold at a rate that was light years ahead of the industry. In order to remain relevant, Ford had to come up with a way out and they had to do it fast. Their solution, the Ford Pinto, an automobile that was great on gas, easy to yield, and could…

Words 1760 - Pages 8

Week 1The Pinto Case Essay

THE PINTO CASE A SHORT SUMMARY In the early 1960s Ford’s market position was being heavily eroded by competition from domestic and foreign manufactures of subcompacts. Lee Iacocca, then President of Ford, was determined to regain Ford’s share of the market by having a new subcompact, the Pinto, in production by 1970. Then Ford engineers crash tested an early model of the Pinto. They found that when the automobile was struck from the rear at 20 miles per hour, the gas tank regularly ruptured. Stray…

Words 575 - Pages 3

The Ethical Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case Essay examples

Dilemma in the Ford Pinto Case On August 10, 1978 three young girls died in a 1973 Ford Pinto after being stuck from the rear by a driver in a van. The Ford Pinto was completely engulfed in flames and the accident resulted in the death of the three young girls. Today, the debate continues regarding whether or not The Ford Motor Company was responsible for this case and many other cases involving the Pinto bursting into flames resulting in disfigurement or death. Ford has argued for…

Words 1595 - Pages 7

Ethics Essay

Ethics Essay: Ford Pinto Madness Todd Hwang Outline: I. Introduction II. Test-Evidence Hiding III. Ignoring the options IV. Economic vs. Ethical Decision V. The Numbers VI. Lobbyist Techniques VII. Conclusion I. Introduction The Ford Motor Company debuted a new line of cars called Ford Pinto in 1971. In order to compete in a new American market of subcompact cars, with the advice of Lee Iacocca, the automobile was designed and produced in one of the shortest production…

Words 1446 - Pages 6

Harold R. Staffeldt Case Summary

Michael Cosentino and his counterpart was Chief Ford attorney James F. Neal. The case was described as David vs. Goliath when you compare well equipped the defense was, with about 80 people and a budget of about $1 million, vs the Elkhart County state's attorney who had help from a couple of volunteer law professors and students and a budget of about $20,000. During the trial, Judge Harold R. Staffeldt advised the jury that it had to prove that Ford was guilty of “plain, conscious and unjustifiable…

Words 669 - Pages 3

Consumer and Pinto Decisions Section Essay

Pinto Decisions Richard J Fry Financial Accounting Pinto Decisions Section 1: Introduction and situational analysis: Although safety seems to be much more at the forefront for automobile consumers, during the time of the article (1977) this was not the case. The main agreement against implementing safety features throughout the article was the cost-to-benefit analysis with the chance of catastrophic company failure if manufacturing costs increased. On the other side of the coin is the human…

Words 956 - Pages 4

Fast Fod Essay

Holding Companies Accountable Every day businesses and corporations are conducting business with their best interest and profits at mind and disreguarding the safety and wellbeing of its concumers. As concumers we trust that theses companies are providing us with the best products and they are safe for us but we know little about what goes on behind the senses.Some of the businesses, and manufactures we chose and trust are chosing profit over our wellbeing and safety.Little oversight…

Words 966 - Pages 4

Micro: Marginal Cost and non Price Competition Essay

What do mutual interdependence and uncertainty mean with respect to oligopoly? Why are they special characteristics of oligopoly? One of the key characteristics of oligopoly is interdependence. Any change in the price and other economic factors by a firm will also bring about a change in the pricing policy of the rivals, as competition is limited. Apart from taking into account the demand for its products or cost of the products, oligopoly firms also consider the reactions of other rival firms…

Words 2248 - Pages 9