Some circumstances allow prosecution to use statements made by a suspect after invoking Miranda, so long as it is not a result of further police questioning (Questioning). In crime TV this is often portrayed inaccurately as police often continue to question a suspect in the hopes they will feel compelled to answer questions to maintain innocence after they have requested an attorney or remain silent. If a person in interrogation requests a lawyer to look over a police document before they sign it police may continue to question because the lawyer was requested only for the document and not for the entire interrogation (Quesioning). If someone is arrested twice in a short span of time they must reassert their Miranda rights. They can remain silent for the first interrogation, however if they choose to talk in an interrogation the evidence gathered is admissible in court because it is up to them to assert their right to remain silent each time