Political Agenda

Words: 1317
Pages: 6

II. Zafersky’s made the argument in, “Spectator Politics and the Revival of Public Argument” that “revival of the art of argument is an ideal to which we should aspire” (Zafersky 414). I argue that the data provided in Ridout’s study, “Does the Media Agenda Reflect the Candidates’ Agenda?” supports a trend towards the revival of public argument. Ridout found that there is little convergence between media issue coverage and candidates issues agendas. He went on to argue that this not necessarily a negative aspect of journals and that, “it is right for journalists to raise such issues [not in candidates issues agenda]” because these are issues that candidates would otherwise ignore. This is a form of argument and forced political discourse …show more content…
In “Political Language and Political Reality” Edelman argued that political language shapes political reality. I agree , because the written word, the Constitution of the United States, is what defines our political existence and defines what we as Americans believe to be “discontents” and “satisfactions.” However, I argue that language has gone beyond the bounds of the Constitution and has the potential to determinately impact politics. Politicians, business professional, students and many others have questioned the language that shapes our laws and thus shapes our political reality. However, the influence on our self-constructed political reality are not always positive. Biased media, uninformed news coverage and special interests negatively impacts the political reality and distorts the original beliefs that “language help …show more content…
Through personal anecdotes, Hillary brought herself onto the level of her audience, showing that her morals and her life experiences were vested in hard work and kindness, establishing her as the “Champion” for America. Additionally when referencing the Republicans she quoted the song “Yesterday” connecting with the correct demographic, revealing her connection to pop culture, and at the same time attacking the apathetic tendencies of the Republican Party. Additionally, Hillary did not waiver when she reacted to the crowd. When the crowd chanted for her husband she embraced the support by saying “that would make him so happy.” She reacted naturally, with earnest jokes, which allowed the audience to see her