In “Political Language and Political Reality” Edelman argued that political language shapes political reality. I agree , because the written word, the Constitution of the United States, is what defines our political existence and defines what we as Americans believe to be “discontents” and “satisfactions.” However, I argue that language has gone beyond the bounds of the Constitution and has the potential to determinately impact politics. Politicians, business professional, students and many others have questioned the language that shapes our laws and thus shapes our political reality. However, the influence on our self-constructed political reality are not always positive. Biased media, uninformed news coverage and special interests negatively impacts the political reality and distorts the original beliefs that “language help …show more content…
Through personal anecdotes, Hillary brought herself onto the level of her audience, showing that her morals and her life experiences were vested in hard work and kindness, establishing her as the “Champion” for America. Additionally when referencing the Republicans she quoted the song “Yesterday” connecting with the correct demographic, revealing her connection to pop culture, and at the same time attacking the apathetic tendencies of the Republican Party. Additionally, Hillary did not waiver when she reacted to the crowd. When the crowd chanted for her husband she embraced the support by saying “that would make him so happy.” She reacted naturally, with earnest jokes, which allowed the audience to see her