1. In earlier research conducted by some other researcher to determine the correlations between prejudice and political beliefs. They came up with a show a lot of margin between the feedback received the result highlighted a lower intelligence in the early childhood and this implies that there may be a greater tendency that responder could grow up to be more aggressive on racial issues in the future. The research also ascertained that lower intelligent children could grow up to be a racist when grown up. Furthermore, Hudson and Buseri (2012) take the study forward by including conservatism in their research to determine intelligence relation to prejudice. A conservative person holds on to traditional attitudes and values and takes a great deal of precautions about change or innovation, typically in relation to different beliefs which varies from politics or religion. The research by Hodson and Busseri was a research of average stating that not all social conservative individuals that are prejudiced and not all the liberals as well. They hold either both of their finding on both axis of the equation; extreme right and the extreme left to find a possible answer to some of the margins. The research shows a clear difference between the past researches as well. It wasn’t that the …show more content…
The preconceived notion about different individual could not certainly states emphatically which side of the ladder they would be sitting. The research has shown the relationship between the various indicators and perception of people ranging from intelligent, prejudice, political belief and racism. As it implies prejudice is an unjustified assumption toward a an individual. It basically believed that intelligent individual are easily prejudiced due to their political belief, social membership they belong to, their sex, ethnicity, age, religion and race. To a great deal, being smart or intelligent does not imply that an individual could be a racist or better still