Pro Animal Testing Cons

Words: 901
Pages: 4
Open Document
People who support the use of animal testing have a belief that the benefits to people outweigh the consequences to animals( ). Animal testing is a huge problem in the U.S. It is cruel and abusive though there are advancements in modern science and experiments called “In vitro”. If animal testing is stopped then scientist can use alternative methods.

One place animals are tested in is a laboratory where animals are tested to see if certain products are safe. Research animals are used only for scientific research, medical and veterinary investigations in testing drugs,cosmetics, and other consumer products( ). These animals get chemicals, mixtures, and serums rubbed on their skin, squirted in their eyes, and injected for the benefit of humans. …show more content…
Doctors test new surgical techniques on animals before trying similar procedures on humans( ). The animals get new surgical techniques tested on them when it’s needed, and so animal needs don’t matter when compared to humans. Researchers argue whether people should be testing on animals or not. Some say there are no research alternatives that can replicate the complex biology of human( ). Researchers don’t know if they should be testing animals or not. Some of the researchers that are for animal testing say there are no other …show more content…
are standing up for the animals and some people did some drastic things. The text states, “The most extreme activists have broken into laboratories, released animals, and physically harassed the researchers involved.”( ). This shows how far some people are willing to go to stop animal testing. If people are willing to break into laboratories; what else could they do? In 1960 public began to turn against animal testing( ). This means the public is beginning to see that animal testing is cruel, inhuman, and wrong.

In addition there are many organizations that have to do with animals. Some are the American Society for the Prevention of the Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). The ASPCA was founded by Henry Bergh in 1866. Henry was on the welfare of animals in the U.S.( ). Also PETA was made to help animals. By 1990 it had more than 400,000 members( ). These groups show that people don’t want to to test or hurt animals anymore. PETA and ASPCA were just the beginning and later many more groups were
Show More

Related Documents: Pro Animal Testing Cons

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

other companies still use animals to test their products. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel and inhumane. Testing on animals is hurting them and is very expensive than alternate methods. Although animal testing has contributed to many life saving cures animals are still being tortured. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane because it is hurting animals. According to the website ProCon.org it quotes, “ According to the Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are…

Words 639 - Pages 3

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

the circulation of blood within animals. He did this by testing on live animals for medical research. With this said, The use of research animals in the laboratory did not become widespread in Europe until the 19th century. Around 1896 the National Institute of Health took an active role in encouraging proper care and use of laboratory animals. Almost 100 years later, PETA came around mandating more rules against any type of testing on animals. Thus causing testing of certain things to become much…

Words 427 - Pages 2

What Are The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

about animal testing. There are pros and cons for animal testing. Many people believe that animal testing is unacceptable, yet others believe it acceptable and beneficial. Animals should not be used for scientific or commercial testing because it is wrong to test on other living organisms and cruel to cause them pain. My first contention that is against animal testing is that it is usually defective. Most experiments that involve animals are usually faulty, taking the lives of faultless animals. For…

Words 442 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Animal testing has always been a controversy in today’s society; it is the idea of whether it is right or wrong to test on animals that people constantly argue about. People tend to not realize that humans and animals are different in many ways. To test cosmetics on an animal would not necessarily be the brightest idea because of these differences. There are alternative routes that can be taken to limit the abuse animals might be experiencing during the testing process as well as helping the human…

Words 694 - Pages 3

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Stanford University. Animal testing is an experimentation carried out on animals. Animal experimentation is used to advance scientific understanding, develop and test potential form of treatments and medication, and is also used as models to study diseases. Animal testing is definitely unnecessary because it is cruel and inhumane, extremely expensive, and inaccurate science. First of all animal testing is completely unnecessary because it is cruel and inhumane. Animal testing is killing over 100…

Words 474 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Testing on animals should be banned because animals are dehydrated and starved, the results are not 100% accurate, and it's more expensive than other forms of testing. Over 100,000,000 animals are killed every because of animal testing. Including mice, rats, frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, fish, and birds. Some that are burned, crippled, and die from fatal chemicals. Animal testing should be put to a stop now because animals fell just like us. Animal testing should be…

Words 410 - Pages 2

Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Are you against people test animals and harming them? Every year 100 million animals die from being tested on in laboratories. Animal testing is cruel because it insists of inhumane treatments and causes of death. Animal testing isn’t cruel because it helps insure safety of drugs. “Drugs in particular can carry significant dangers with their use but animal testing allows researchers to initially gauge the safety of drugs” (animal testing). Animal testing is cruel because it does inhumane treatment…

Words 395 - Pages 2

The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

belief that animals should never be tested on for cosmetic use is the most supported viewpoint. As science constantly advances, so do the alternative methods that may replace animal testing. While animal testing for medicines that directly relate to life-or-death situations may be easier to support, testing for superficial needs is not worth the torture and cruelty done to animals. True understanding of what testing goes into products shows the often overlooked injustices plaguing animals; blissful…

Words 789 - Pages 4

The Pros And Cons Of Cosmetic Animal Testing

treatment of animals. It is often stated that animal testing is often used to advanced our understanding of psychological issues such as mental health disorders. However, the word “testing” is quite frightening sometimes. For example, cosmetic animal testing is very well known-- cosmetic animal testing involves the suffering and death of many animals. Furthermore, For a very long time I used to compare cosmetic animal testing to animal psychological testing because I believed all animal testing are inhumane…

Words 123 - Pages 1

Animal Experimentation Argumentative Essay

subject for animal experimentation. One small, white rat could provide clues for developing a new antibiotic to fight the common cold or even more extreme-the cure to cancer or brain damage. A thank-you might not only belong to the researchers and doctors, but to the animals used in their experiments. Animal experimentation should be continued as many animals respond similarly to humans, animals have shorter life spans, and it gives researchers a way to test without human harm. Animal experimentation…

Words 989 - Pages 4