Main point that is provided by Proposition 34 was change of the death penalty by life imprisonment. Sentenced does not have right of parole in this case. They would have to work within the prison system to pay retribution to the families of the victims. This proposition was …show more content…
This way their arguments are based not only on their ethical points of view but also grounded on the experience gained during that time. This way both arguments in favor and against have to be taken into consideration. Supporters of the Abolition of the death penalty are focused on the ethical part of the issue stating that this way it would help to omit killing innocent people who got in the cell of the condemned to death by mistake or because of the imperfection of the judiciary. Opponents of this point of view are stating that this would cost too much for the citizens of California, while criminals would be provided with the housing and medical insurance during their lifetimes which is unfair regarding to their victims or victim’s