Public Schools Are Better Than Charter Schools

Words: 1099
Pages: 5

An issue that people are debating today is whether publics are better than charter school. There is multitude of public schools in Chicago. The real question is, are public school helping students to expand their education? Some people agree that Charter schools are helping students to succeed. People believe that Charter schools provide a quality of education, high standards of their ACT scores, high graduation rates and great discipline. On the other hand, there are people who are against charter schools and believe that charter schools are not successful. Additionally, people argue that charter schools have lack of innovation. Every child has the right to get the prober education; although, in the city of Chicago they’re a lot of public …show more content…
Over the past few years charter schools are proving that they have high standars on the student’s education. According to the Catalyst of Chicago mention, “Noble’s graduation rate is higher (89.7% to 73.8%), drop-out rate is lower (2.9% to 5.5%), and mobility rate is lower (7.8% to 17.6%)” (Milkie). The number of drops are lower than 2.9-5.5 is due to the students who transfer to schools because of the strict discipline that they have. Charter schools have been on top ranking on the ACT with the selective enrolment in 2011 such as, UIC College prep with a score of 21.2 behind Pritzker with a score of 21.0 and Noble Street College Prep with 20.6 Furthermore, in the study of The National Alliance for Public Charter schools mentions “On Top of the World: Public Charter Schools and International Benchmarking, 2013-2014, the four charter schools that participated outperformed averages from across the United States, showing that the students from the charters are in fact prepared to compete globally in the areas of reading, math, and science”( Anandwala) .Students who attend to charter schools are ready to perform further on their …show more content…
In his argument mentions that, “We get diverted with all these arguments about creating other kinds of schools," he emphasized. "I've got to create an environment that [works] for my entire school system, because I can't have 10,000 new different schools." Fixing existing schools must be our top priority. "If we look at this thing in a creative way, we can fix our public schools," he maintained. "It's going to take more money, and we can do that."(Bennett) Also, that it would help the school on their system and believes that it would students to be successful. Additionally he says that, let’s fix the existing schools; let's not set up new ones"—rings hollow to those educators who are deeply frustrated with the present system. "We want to give people right now a chance to create new kinds of schools, not as a way to attack the system but as a way to encourage the system to improve."(Bennett). If the government destroyed the traditional schools they don’t give them the opportunity to show on how great the system is. For example when Bennett sates that, “We need to give opportunities to people who really care about kids" to create and run public schools. "It can help kids, it can help improve the system—and that to me is the bottom