Raphael Lemkin Genocide

Words: 899
Pages: 4

In the year of 1915, the world was shocked by the genocidal atrocities committed by Ottoman Empire against the hapless Armenians. Since then, this century has witnessed steadily increasing incidents of genocide such as those in Germany, in Rwanda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ethiopia, Cambodia, Bangladesh and the most recently in Sudan. The inception of a specific legal regime to deal with the crime of genocide can be traced to the growing incidence of violence perpetrated against groups, targeted on account of race, ethnicity or national origin. Genocide is a crime that goes against the highest of human values and breaches the most important of human rights – the life, dignity and equality of other individuals. It is crime of such heinous nature and character that it fairly and effectively be dealt with only on an …show more content…
The word genocide was special as it signified a whole new concept which had not been previously recognized in the international community although it had been taking place since ages. Unlike most other “war crimes”, genocide did not involve targeting a state or an army; rather it involved systematic targeting of an entire group of people, based simply on a certain characteristic – ethnical, racial, linguistic, political etc. Genocide did not seek to establish “group domination” but rather, it sought “group destruction”. Raphael Lemkin however, limited his definition to “national and ethnical” groups , even though the core idea of the concept was intentional annihilation of a certain group of people. Similarly Frank Chalk and Kurt Johannsohn have chosen to define it as a one sided mass killing where the group and the membership thereof is as “defined by the perpetrator” So it can be said with some amount of surety that in popular scholarly opinion, genocide as a concept is the intentional annihilation of an entire population of people based on any specific