Furthermore, Woodcock's version of the Red River Rebellion mentioned the difficulties faced by the prairie people due to the conditions in the treaty - more specifically “the Metis -- who were not included in the treaties'', which lead to the Rebellion, (Woodcock, 273). The Metis were not taken into account during the treaty so as a result, part of their lives were forced to be abandoned and had no land to live in, this was an honest part of history that Woodcock communicated. Woodcocks wrote his book with little bias, not showing support for the side he chose to write about nor remorse for the opposite side, he wrote the facts and events, the cause and effects of the Red River Rebellion of 1885. On the contrary, Mulvaney and Brown were the opposite, they’re descriptions and illustrations showed bias in various