The Soviet Union was becoming stronger in terms of their economic and social stance. This had the potential of luring some Americans into the rather unfair analogy that would disrupt the country’s democratic governance. President Truman used the containment theory to seek approval from the Congress in order to confer financial help to the Turkish and Greek governments to deal with communism. He insisted that there should be a difference between free people and totalitarian regimes that were out to disrupt normality (647). On the other hand, President Eisenhower used a different and peaceful approach in relation to the containment theory. He approached the Soviet Union with a partnership venture of exploring and collaborating efforts towards making the world a better place. This would, in turn, repel any harsh ideas against the …show more content…
The US under his ruling managed to partner with the Soviet Union thus creating a sense of stability. The military-industrial complex had the potential to disrupt democratic efforts meant to maintain peace between the US and the Soviet Union. An example of the military-industrial complex during Eisenhower tenure occurred after the Second World War. Normal American industries opted to convert their operations for purposes of defending the country and in turn partnered with the military wing (656). Eisenhower was accurate with his opinion since many governments fail to consider the detrimental consequences of waging war instead of considering democratic moves as an option to sort conflicts. In addition, the military system of the US would lose its integrity due to such unethical practices. The military-industrial complex is still in practice today thanks to President