We did a rhetorical analysis activity for the "Fail Fast" reading. I did not do too well on this as I ended up confusing summarizing with analyzing. But I understood it better after leaning form my mistakes and improving upon them. In essay 2, page 2-3, paragraph 3, I responded to Wolpert's claim that our visual skills have improved because of the way we obtain information these days, I responded by saying, however, it is not worth sacrificing our critical thinking skills just to have better visual skills. This whole 2nd essay was an argument which was kind of a response to Carr's claim whether we agreed with him or not. While writing the 2nd essay, I learned to lay down a strong arguments in response to …show more content…
I did not have much trouble with this part compared to others. I think I had learned it quite well in high school, which helped me in this course as well. Avoiding plagiarism is also one of the main focuses and I have done very in being successful at that. The EZ research tutorial taught me how to look up college level sources through the library's web page for free. Through that I was able to find appropriate sources to back up my writings. Paper 3 really helped me understand the details that went into quoting, paraphrasing and documenting sources. I learned how to use introduce and cite properly in MLA format. We talked about the different ways to introduce quotes in a writings, which have different impacts. In essay 3, page 2, paragraph 2-3, I introduces the quotes by saying , according to Suzanne Goldberg and the other by saying, in a report by Dana Gunders. I think I have improved a lot with my use of quotes in my writings comparing essay 1 and essay