Relativism and Morality Essay

Submitted By Tricianicole1
Words: 742
Pages: 3
Open Document
Relativism and Morality
Tricia Kilburn
SOC 120 Introduction to Ethics & Social Responsibility
Instructor John Meeks
August 4, 2013

RELATIVISM AND MORALITY Lenn Goodman makes a good argument about his idea of things that are wrong. Some of the things he discusses are genocide, politically induced famine, and germ warfare; terrorism, hostage taking, and child warriors; slavery, polygamy, and incest; and rape and female genital cutting. He makes some really good arguments. His details and intellect provide examples of why those things are wrong and because of that I have clear bases of why I agree with him. I do not believe that any one should take advantage of another person in any way nor discriminate or take their life because it is unmoral. When Goodman talks about genocide, famine, and germ warfare, he said that “All living things make claims to life.” and “Murder is wrong because it destroys a human subject.” (Goodman, Pg. 88). These are both excellent arguments about why genocide should be universally wrong. Goodman argues that warfare is not always wrong. I disagree with him about this. How many lives have been lost due to war, whether it be germ warfare or any other type of warfare? If war is universally wrong, then the subjects of a community will not need to be protected from other communities or countries. I believe that many wars could be avoided if the four areas Goodman discusses are followed universally. Genocide and famine happen because of fear and hatred. If it is embedded in the customs and traditions of every culture that genocide and political famine are wrong, I believe it will be easier to enforce a loving community and not one that is filled with fear and hatred. The reason why I agree with Goodman’s is because the article stated about every state having terrorist and suicide bombers, it is just as simple as every society from different places having the same issues and the only differences are the name of cities, states and countries. Every culture has its problems that exist every day at any given time. Every place have people who are known as terrorist but we just don’t know how they manage to blend in so well. For example the officer who was serving in the US Army who killed innocent service members no one knew it would be our own kind. Suicide bombers are often unveiled when their plans fall apart, but until that happens we never know who they are. I hope we as humans will ultimately get it together. To be honest a lot of the things in this article I couldn’t really grasp. It talked about things that didn’t catch my attention but I knew a little of what was going on. In the article, Lenn Goodman discourses slavery as an act of wrong and I must say that I harmonize with his opinions on this matter. Back in the slavery era, societies
Show More

Related Documents: Relativism and Morality Essay

Relativism And Morality

Relativism and Morality (Some Moral Minama) Erin Collier Soc 120/Ashford University June 10, 2013 In this writers opinion Lenn Goodman is right, there are certain things that are simply wrong. Seeking to control others through violence and or force is not right. Four areas Goodman touched on in his article, Some Moral Minima were (1) genocide, politically induced famine, and germ warfare; (2) terrorism, hostage taking, and child warriors; (3) slavery, polygamy, and incest; and (4) rape and…

Words 730 - Pages 3

Cultural Relativism And Morality

Carlise Richmond World View Assignment #2 American History March 10, 2015 Cultural Relativism and Morality Cultural relativism was coined by Franz Boas, a anthropological researcher, who was fascinated by other cultures and languages of indigenous cultures of the Baffin Isle Inuit. Franz said that a "...civilization is not something absolute, but ... is relative, and ... our ideas and conceptions are true only so far as our civilization goes…

Words 630 - Pages 3

Cultural Relativism: Degrees of Morality Essays

Intro to Ethics 2/12/2013 Moral Judgement Paper Morality, when it comes into question there is never a right answer. "What is it to be moral?" is a question many ask and get many answers to, each rivaling each other in their definition of what it means to live morally. In attempting to answer this question one must carefully analyze core philosophies that are underlying in the definition of morality yet are critical in understanding that much more what it is to be moral. It must be noted…

Words 1346 - Pages 6

Examples Of Moral Relativism

Morality and Relativism Philosopher Jesse Prinz wrote the article “Death of Morality” in 2011. He was a much known Philosopher at CUNY. In his article he discusses morality and how it relates to culture. He finds morality to be cultural. According to dictionary.com, cultural relativismis”the concept that the importance of a particular cultural idea varies from onesociety or societal subgroup to another, the view that ethical and moralstandards are relative to what a particular society or culture…

Words 585 - Pages 3

Societal Relativism

Moral relativism has two major sections individual, or subjective, and societal relativism. Individualism relativism is the idea that the moral order is dependent on each individual’s own ideas and beliefs. Societal relativism is the idea that the moral order is based on the surrounding cultural ideas. Relativists believe that all of these moral orders are valid and are all their own; this means that you should be able to understand other’s morality even if they differ from your own. As Oderberg…

Words 394 - Pages 2

What Are Plato's Arguments Against Moral Relativity

religious leaders), and continues to stir controversy among philosophers and non-philosophers alike. This is perhaps not very surprising in view of recent evidence that people’s intuitions about moral relativism vary widely. Despite the fact that many philosophers are quite critical about moral relativism, there are few contemporary philosophers who defend forms of it. This includes prominent figures such as David B. Wong, Jesse J. Prinz, J. David Vellemen, and Gilbert Harman. The…

Words 770 - Pages 4

Moral Standards In William Scanlon's What We Owe Each Other

William Scanlon explains how moral standards can differ in various ways. Scanlon defines moral relativism as a thesis that there is no single optimum standard for the moral appraisal of acts, but rather a variety of standards. Parametric universalistic hold views which allow for variations in what is right by applying a definite set of substantive moral principles to varying circumstances. Moral relativism can be deemed consistent when it assumes a single normative perspective from which verdicts can…

Words 585 - Pages 3

Cultural Relativism Divine Command Theory

Anthony Parrillo Professor Frim PHI-160 8 November 2015 Cultural Relativism and Divine Command Theory Philosophers have been arguing for centuries about the nature of morality. In the field of ethics, philosophers have focused their attention on answering important questions such as: What is right and wrong? What is good and bad? By what process should we make moral decisions? Philosophers have posited answers through a range of moral theories. Unfortunately, no theory is perfect. Not surprisingly…

Words 993 - Pages 4

What Is Cultural Ethical Relativism

Cultural Ethical Relativism The idea of Cultural Ethical Relativism is that there are many cultures throughout our world, but there does not lie an independent standard from which we may judge another culture. “The argument for Cultural Ethical Relativism is (Rachels, 2012: p.18): P1. If Different cultures have different moral codes, then there is no objective truth in morality. P2. Different cultures have different moral codes. C. Therefore, there is no objective truth in morality.” Each society…

Words 626 - Pages 3

Examples Of Subjective Ethical Relativism

The sense of morality in the empty world The subjective ethical relativism mainly suggests us that it is up to particular person to decide what is moral or immoral, right or wrong. According to this, the person is “justified” to do anything whatever (s)he feels good thing to do. The questions are: where do these internal “rules” and morality come from? From the senses of the person or from his/her attitudes towards the others? If the last one is true, would person feel any moral duties if one…

Words 583 - Pages 3