Essay about Religious vs Science

Submitted By zeetoe
Words: 4426
Pages: 18
Open Document
Religion or Science
Kristine Le
PHI 208
Dr. Kate Andrew
March 01, 2013

Religion or Science Philosopher and historian David Hume was considered as a deist, aside from being an empiricist and someone who usually supported the theory of evolution. Even if Hume believed that God created the universe, he did not think that God was further involved in anything beyond creation. This was especially true in how he formulated his moral theory wherein he claimed that man was inherently inclined to do good because it was beneficial to him. As a result of this, religion was not necessary for man to do well towards his fellow man. Hume went on to move that miracles were very rare events, but he never really denied its existence. According to Hume, a person who considered himself wise should just base his beliefs on concepts that had the highest degree of probability. Since it was more probable, due to the rate of occurrences of the events, for miracles to not happen, it served as greater evidence against miracles. So is it religion or science? Hume study in philosophy during the height of European Enlightenment was the one that truly directed his life’s works and direction (Geisler 1999). The theories that were formed during the Scottish Enlightenment bore the mark of much of the contested relation between the religion, human nature and sociability.[1] Hume was infamous for his argument that religion could not be demonstrated when it came to the limited human understanding. However, the Hume’s point was more of even without the support of the religion aspect; it was intrinsic human nature to demonstrate morality in the context of sociability.[2] This became an area of great debate in the remainder of the century under Scottish context. Morality had set out debates about the “regulation of self-interest” by which men choose the best rules of conduct or policy for society that would be best efficient based from theories and other proposition that they could find (Wilson 2004).[3] The theorist’s role was to provide for acceptable moral frameworks by which there would always be significant trade offs between personal and group sacrifices in exchange for desired outcomes for the society.[4] Hume’s moral theory emphasized the intrinsic ability of man to be good without having to adhere to the concept of religion.[5] It gave emphasis on the observer’s standpoint for a chain of events that involved the agent and the receiver and the spectator of a deed, wherein it would be accounted as a virtue or a vice.[6] His theories gave birth to the earliest ideas for the utilitarian school of thought when it came to philosophy.[7] Adam Smith was one of his supporters when it came to the morality that had to do with its utility value.[8] Hume did not pursue much of the utility value of the action but he certainly sparked the following of philosophers in the likes of John Stuart Mill as well as Jeremy Bentham.[9] The moral theory was more inclined towards the fact that he was refuting the necessity of God or a religion for man to be good and to function well in society because values can either be learned or were already naturally.[10] This took away the value of a person’s good will towards others since he merely does it because he naturally acquired or developed it, motive that goes beyond that goes beyond this theory. The discussion of empiricism in a critique against the moral theory is important because it was the philosophy that dominantly motivated Hume’ theories. Apologetic writers had pointed out how Hume’s philosophy was problematic, specifically with his skeptical empiricism approach. According to Geisler, this approach was self-defeating not just because skepticism was vulnerable to criticism but from the methodology Hume employed to qualify for meaningful prepositions.[11] Hume moved that propositions needed to be empirical or analytical. However the statement “only analytic or empirical
Show More

Related Documents: Essay about Religious vs Science

Globalization and Jihad Pro Jihad Essay

Jihad vs. McWorld: Coaching Re-reading text multiple times Take time to understand the text Reading it paragraph by paragraph Questioning/annotating the text Big Picture Thesis: The tendencies of what am here calling the forces of Jihad and the forces of McWorld operate with equal strength in opposite directions. Paragraph by paragraph 2. Jihad and McWorld are in conflict with each other. Outcome is more chaos and less democracy. 3. A listing of the values of McWorld. Market, resource…

Words 461 - Pages 2

Creationism In Schools Research Paper

and by doing so, violates human rights? Table of Contents 1.) Introduction: Overview of Opposition and Claims Page 2 2.) Opposition: The Freedom of Religious Expression and Rebuttal Pages 2-4 3.) Claim 1: Creationism Denies Scientific Achievement Pages 4-6 4.) Claim 2: Creationism Sees Modern Science as a Direct Threat to Their Faith Pages 6-7 5.) Conclusion Page 7-8 6.) Annotated Works Cited Pages 9- Introduction:…

Words 1825 - Pages 8

Renaissance Traits Essay

meadows and forests. Compare with Reinissance Traits Group VS. Individual Religious VS. Secular Insular (uninterested in cultures) VS. Well learned Reinissance (1350-1550) Rebirth of economic and poltical in city states of northern Italy. Began in Italy because of great Trade, surplus of food and wealth. Extra people for crafts. Charactersitics: Great achievments in art )better perspective and detail) Literary achievments and science and math. Italien city states: why are they conductive Popolo:…

Words 665 - Pages 3

Essay about Chapter Notes

of Christianity 2) In 1500, Christianity was mostly limited to Europe. 1. small communities in Egypt, Ethiopia, southern India, and Central Asia 2. serious divisions within Christianity (Roman Catholic vs. Eastern Orthodox) 3. on the defensive against Islam a. loss of the Holy Land by 1300 b. fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453 3) Western Christendom Fragmented: The…

Words 2286 - Pages 10

Galileo And Aristotles And Their Effect On Science And Religion Debate

Aristotle’s and their effect on the Science and Religion Debate TONETTE BEAMON Galileo and Aristotle’s and their effect on the Science and Religion Debate Many people believe that science and religion are separate although scientific theory roots can be linked to religion and the church’s view of the world. Religious people and scientist have disagreed for years about what is considered truth when it comes to science and religion but some scientist and religious people with moderate views believe…

Words 1314 - Pages 6

A Brief Note On Intelligent Design

Intelligent Design is religion disguised as science, and as such, should not be taught in our public schools. Introduction The town of Dover, PA looks like any other small towns in central Pennsylvania, but in October 2004 when the local school board proposed a slight alteration to the high school biology curriculum a fault line erupted between those who think of intelligent design as science and something that should be taught…

Words 1695 - Pages 7

Glenn Branch's Argumentative Analysis

For centuries, people have debated the topic of Religion and Science. Many claim that Religion is the truth and we should believe everything that was written because it would lead us to be divine and would guarantee us a spot in Heaven with God. Other believed that Science is the real answers. They believed that us as humans needed to search throughout the Earth and find an logical answer to everything. They believed everything that has happened, happens, and will happen has a logical answer. However…

Words 1709 - Pages 7

The Scopes Monkey Trial

Larson discusses the case in its totality. Initially the goal of the organization was to not to criticize any particular religious groups, but wanted to argue for academic freedom. Larson writes, “During the twenties, the ACLU executive committee was never openly hostile toward religion per se…” (Larson 73). In other words, the ACLU’s intentions were not to criticize religious organizations, but to argue for academic freedom, but that was not the case in the Scopes Monkey Trial. The introduction…

Words 535 - Pages 3

Humanities Today Paper Assignment Week 1

culture and values expressed during the specific time periods. The emphasis is on how people communicate, how they express themselves, and what religious beliefs they practiced, their mind set if you will. It’s not as statistical as let’s say a scientific approach. Social sciences on the other hand approach things from another angle. Social Science is based more on how society interacts with one another and how relationships play a part in our development of society. Take modern art today as…

Words 753 - Pages 4

The Gay Debate: The Bible And Homosexuality

Social Science. Slick published on his website a review of the speech arguing Vines has no proof to claim that homosexuality is not a sin (Slick). These two experts disagree on whether homosexuality is a sin and disagree on the use of Genesis 19. One believes the story of Sodom and Gomorrah is biblical evidence that homosexuality is a sin, while the other believes it is one?s perspective that leads them to think the story is evidence. Within Religious Knowledge systems unlike the Natural Sciences there…

Words 1437 - Pages 6