Republican Arguments Against Climate Change

Words: 856
Pages: 4

Climate change policy is one of the most pressing issues in politics today. Democrats claim that it is a threat to humanity, one that has the potential to endanger everyone; the Republicans claim that the liberal crusade focused on combating climate change is a threat to American business and capitalistic competition. On each and every side of the issue, politicians are convinced that they are in the right and that any other belief is not only incorrect but dangerous. In such a toxic political climate, it seems clear that only a truly strong and convincing stance can cultivate political support. However, the factors contributing to environmental policy suggest that rather than a dogmatic stance, the solution is a carefully researched and balanced bipartisan approach that both promotes environmental and economic concerns.
To garner true bipartisan support, environmental policy must have economic incentives for Republicans, yet also incorporate substantive environmental protection for
…show more content…
According to the Pew Research Center, many Americans recognize the dangerous potential of climate change and their own culpability in causing it; almost half of those surveyed believe that humans are to blame for climate change, with a slightly lower percentage saying they think it will cause serious adverse effects. However, a majority of those surveyed said that “Americans will make major changes to their ways of life” and/or “New technology will solve most climate problems” within the next 50 years. These answer choices are indicative of a people that are both content with ignoring the issue until they are forced to face the consequences and believe an easy fix will materialize that will prevent the country from having to make difficult decisions regarding climate