Arguments Against Climate Change

Words: 1279
Pages: 6

Climate change crisis has been receiving numerous attempt to falsify or theorize its mere essence. Deniers are wholeheartedly fighting against it and the majority of the confused public are claiming doubt about the severity and factuality of it. Yet, a question of personal integrity arises, are people in denial about climate change because they are genuinely confused or because they are afraid of the consequences of facing it? The answer may not be simple to state, especially since inner motivation and reasons can vary significantly from one person to another. Maybe people are in reality in dilemma and just need proper guidance, on the other, they might be purely selfish and ignore the facts of climate crisis for their own benefits. To response …show more content…
the Climate,” Klein outlines the motivation, or rather the fear behind the persistence of deniers against climate science consensus. Her argument that only effective mean to address climate change crisis is to change the infrastructure of the political and the economical system. And this bold approach has multiple undesirable effects that deniers have the right to be afraid of, but not the right to deny nor ignore the problem. She argues that although capitalism has provided the U.S citizen with much freedom, it is the reason for many other implications such as job loss and inflation and that is why it needs to be shattered. Capitalism has long sheltered people with social and economic privileges and destroying it will primarily affect them drastically. As Yale’s climate scientist, Dan Kahan, explains “cultural cognition,” which is in our human nature to perceive the information we get from the point of view that would sustain our version of the world instead of facing the reality (75) Consequently, people of privileges such as governments officials and business owners that exhibits “egalitarian” views will do whatever means to keep their version of reality present at all cost even by rejecting scientific consensus. Another study done by McCright and Dunlap shows the racial of the strong climate deniers to be “conservative white males” who “have disproportionally occupied positions of power within our economy system,” who indeed oppose because of fear of losing their privileges if capitalism is abolished (76). Other deniers would hold on to beliefs such as “nature is limitless” disregarding that we have completely exhausted the plant’s natural resources to a point where it actually became limited. To simply maintain our worldviews, our cultural ideologies have prevented us from doing the right thing. And to justify the denial, people of different social and economic status have let themselves to ignorance and deliberate