Research In Motion: Governance At Risk?

Submitted By toaster65
Words: 1834
Pages: 8
Open Document
Research in Motion: Governance at Risk?

Professor: Horng- Tzu Hao

COMMERCE 4AF3, C03

Introduction
Research In Motion (RIM) is a telecommunications company based in Waterloo, Ontario which has shown a decline in share price and growth since 2008. As a result, RIM’s shareholders have questioned the governance structure of the company, whether those in charge of governance are adequate enough to guide the company into the foreseeable future. Specifically, shareholders are questioning why many directors and Co-CEO’s hold ‘significant’ board level titles. As the committee of independent directors, we have been tasked with the mandate to study the company’s structure, the merits of a lead director versus a chair and what changes, if any, should be made to the company’s board structure and governance as a result of this.
As a committee of independent directors, after studying the company’s organization and roles of its Board of Directors, we have identified three issues relating to RIM’s governance practices. Specifically, there are concerns regarding the board’s independence, its member selection process, the need for segregation of duties from management, as well as the leniency of the responsibilities of the Board of Directors.
The main concern arises as to the lack of segregation of duties as well as to the lack of independence among the board of directors. Management is accountable to the Board of Directors who is in turn accountable to its shareholders. A conflict of interest arises and the chain of accountability is broken with Co-CEOs such as Jim Balsillie (Director, Chair and Co-CEO) and Micheal Lazaridis (Director, President and Co-CEO) present on the Board. At this point, the integrity of management is questionable as both members hold ‘significant’ board level titles. There exists potential for information asymmetry among management (the agents, in this case the Co-CEO’s) who may have superior information over the shareholders (the principal) to maximize the agent’s self interest at the expense of the principal. Thus, a moral hazard problem exists in that management (the agent) can limit voluntary disclosure of information to the owners (shareholders) and may be able to disguise shirking and resulting low profitability. As a result of this, a reorganization of the current structure and implementing a segregation of duties is of utmost importance in this situation to reduce the risk of conflict of interest. Since the Board oversees the integrity of management and serves to keep management in check, the Co-CEO’s Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazardis and other members of management should be asked to resign from the Board. The committee proposes to have a Lead Director for the current time period and slowly transition towards an independent chair as a resolution.
Another point of concern is the way in which members are placed on the board of directors. Many members are simply appointed rather than being elected on as members. For example, the Co-CEO Jim Balsillie was re-appointed onto the Board of Directors. This makes it possible for biases to occur against the interests of RIM’s shareholders since members might have their own interests put before the interest of their shareholders. In order to increase the fairness to shareholders, a proper system must be in place in which board members are chosen. The only way individuals should be brought onto the Board of Directors is through the election process at annual general meetings. This will eliminate any conflicts of interests members may have between themselves and the firm.
Furthermore, it seems that there is a lot of leniency in which the responsibilities of the individual directors are communicated. Although it is a requirement for Board members to attend meetings to the best of their abilities, there are still concerns as to the attendance of members. This
Show More

Related Documents: Research In Motion: Governance At Risk?

Research in Motion Audit Planning Essay

Company and Management Background: Research in Motion (RIM) was founded in 1984 in Waterloo, Ontario. Its founders were then university students Mike Lazaridis and Douglas Fregin. Since its inception in 1984, the company’s product offerings have expanded from the designing, manufacturing and marketing of wireless communication devices to the provision of e-mail, phone, short message service, internet and intra-net application solutions. The company was a pioneer in smartphone devices and until the…

Words 2111 - Pages 9

Why Rim Failed. Essays

non-independent director held the position. The company continues to have an independent Lead Director, as no Chair has been appointed yet. Mr. Richardson the current Lead Director is also a member of the Audit and Risk Management Committee as well as the Compensation, Nomination and Governance Committee. This results in a possible conflict of interest for the Lead Director. Therefore, the board requires an independent Chair that can be in the position to provide fair oversight of the board and committees…

Words 361 - Pages 2

Strategic Management and Swot Analysis Essay

Q1. Environmental Analysis: RIM (Research In Motion) is leading designer and manufacturer for worldwide mobile communication market founded in 1984 based in Waterloo, Ontario. Business mission defines the organisation’s basic function in society in terms of products and services. Business vision defines where the organisation wants to be in the future. Black Berry mission statement is to be the best phone company in the world and for everyone to enjoy their unique service and phone. They are…

Words 1223 - Pages 5

Report: Balance Sheet and Risk Essay examples

.......................................... 2 Business Risks of the Entity – Prepared by Daljinder ............................................................................... 3 Three Significant Audit Risks – Prepared by Wayne & Emily .................................................................. 4 Fraud Risk Assessment – Prepared by Simran.......................................................................................... 5 Risk of Material Misstatement – Prepared by Simran .......…

Words 5478 - Pages 22

FSA notes Essay example

the operations and strategy of the firm – two main strategies: o Cost leader – high ATO, low PM (eco of scale/learning, low R&D, cost controls, efficiency) o Differentiator – low ATO, high PM (high R&D & firm seeks to be unique) • Key success and risks of strategy? • Does the firm have appropriate resources, structure and commitment? • Is the competitive advantage sustainable – any potential changes to industry? • What is the effect of the diversification, horizontal and vertical integration?…

Words 2247 - Pages 9

Explaining The Decline Of The British Economy

London/Warsaw/Oxford University, July 2014 Please answer the following exam questions and submit your write-up through SafeAssign at Blackboard by July 20th. Question One (1): “Explaining the Decline of the British Economy,” McGraw’s three contrasting views Answer: Document 2 most closely aligns with the views of Yergin and Stanislaw in The Commanding Heights? First step for me was to break down the key tenets of all four documents briefly described in Table 1, which support my analysis written…

Words 6315 - Pages 26

Essay about Winter Olympics 2006 Marketing Plan

Torino 2006: What Kind of Olympic Winter Games Were They? A Preliminary Account From an Organizational and Economic Perspective Piervincenzo Bondonio and Nadia Campaniello  Citius, Altius, Fortius! To what extent does the motto of the Olympics relate to Torino 2006? Has the XXth edition of the Olympic Winter Games (OWG) continued the positive trend whereby each edition, with only a few exceptions, surpasses the one before? In which areas have there been improvements, if any? To what extent…

Words 16254 - Pages 66

MGT 301 EXAM 1 NOTES Essay

CHAPTER 1: THE EXCEPTIONAL MANAGER Management: (1) the pursuit of organizational goals efficiently and effectively by (2) integrating the work of people through (3) planning, organizing, leading, and controlling the organizations resources. Efficiency: the means of attaining the organization’s goals Effectiveness: organization’s ends, goals The Multiplier Effect ~influence the organization is multiplied far beyond the results that can be achieved by just one person alone good managers create value…

Words 5193 - Pages 21

Corporation (Fisch) Outline Penn Law Essay

Table of Contents I.) INTRODUCTORY PRINCIPLES 2 A.) Efficiency and Other Concepts 2 B.) Agency and Partnership Law 2 II.) INTRODUCTION TO THE CORPORATE FORM 16 A.) Formation and Structure 16 B.) Debt, Equity, and Valuation 22 III.) CONTROL OF CORPORATE DECISIONS 32 A.) The Role of the Shareholder 32 B.) Management Obligations 50 1.) Duty of Care 51 2.) Duty of Loyalty 56 3.) Duty of Fairness: Parent-Subsidiary Relationships 63 4.) Duty of Good Faith 64 5.) Management Obligations…

Words 62789 - Pages 252

BUSINESS STRATEGY Essay

BUSINESS STRATEGY Apple Case Study MQP-Business[Group 1] Chinedu Madubuike (Murphy) Siyan Zhu (Laceiz) Yucheng Li (Levy) Hongrui Xu( Carey) CONTENT LO1. 4 INTRODUCTION 4 HISTORY 4 MISSION AND VISION 5 DEFINITION OF STRATEGY AND STRATEGY PLANNING CONCEPTS 6 APPLE CURRENT STRATEGY 7 LONG/ MEDIUM TERMS GOALS 8 PRODUCT LIFE CYCLEProduct Life Cycle 9 LO2. 10 PESTEL ANALYSIS 10 SWOT ANALYSIS 17 ANSOFF MATRIX ANALYSIS 21 ANAYLIZING APPLE INC WITH PORTER'S FIVE FORCE 24 BOSTON MATRIX 33 LO3…

Words 9480 - Pages 38