Roman Republic Downfall

Words: 541

Pages: 3

Open Document

In the eventual demise of the Roman Republic, the start can most likely be traced back to the terrible behavior of Rome in the Spanish wars. This led to antagonism between the citizens who supplied soldiery and leadership back in Rome. Even more so, this conduct back in Rome was directly connected to the eventual break with the nobility by the brothers Gracchus. In Numantia in 153 BC, Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus made a treaty with the Spaniards in order to save the trapped army of Mancinus from destruction. The senate dishonorably revoked this treaty, and in doing so disgraced and angered many people and set a chain reaction over more than a century. This betrayal by the senate had profound effect. Due to this, Tiberius felt that he and the memory of his late father was disgraced. Tiberius shocked the system by standing not for a magistracy, but for the office of Tribune. An outstanding member of the Roman Nobles, who was destined to be consul, was …show more content…
In doing this, he acted according to the law, but not in the spirit of the Roman constitution. This set a precedent taht many would follow.
Tiberius was set on a collision course with the senate. For a candidate, Tiberius had many astounding backers, some of which being Servius Galba and Appius Pulcher, both ex-consuls. He was known for his ideas for land reform, which eventually got him the support of the common people. With the support of both the backers and the common people, Tiberius was elected tribune for the year 133 BC.
Gracchus’s sheer support from many of Rome’s politicians demonstrates that many saw land reform as overdue, due to Rome’s vast majority of land being owned by the rich and powerful. Tiberius’ land reform was loved by many, and the public felt it as heartfelt and sincere. But he faced severe opposition by those who held significant public lands. One of these was Scipio Nasica, who would be Tiberius’ enemy till Tiberius’

Essay on Roman Empire vs. Roman Rebublic

Though the roman empire and the roman republic vary in their political structures they are quite common in the structures of their social hierarchy and reasoning for their downfalls. The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one year…

Words 893 - Pages 4

Roman Republic Research Paper

The Downfall of The Roman Republic Many believe the downfall of Rome was due to its cruel, tireless leaders who put themselves before their country. While those leaders certainly played a role in destroying Rome, Rome already had many structural weaknesses before those leaders ever came along. The main structural weakness of the Roman Republic was in their core values - their odd idealistics. The Romans valued the trait of ambition a lot, and also had a sense of superiority compared to non-Romans…

Words 815 - Pages 4

Essay on Fall of the Roman Republic

The Fall of The Roman Republic The Ancient Roman Republics downfall can be linked to the corruption of the government. Conflicts of the government powers lead the government to become inefficient thusly leading to its fall. The Roman Constitution was unwritten; it was more of a collection of oral traditions and laws that was passed down, and over time parts became vague and undefined. Being that they weren’t written down lead to conflicts of interpretation and obstruction of the traditions…

Words 686 - Pages 3

Why Did Rome Fall

“I came, I saw, I conquered,” Julius Caesar. Rome overcame many obstacles throughout their history. They transformed from a group of scattered people, to a Republic, and then into an Empire. They had many great rulers, including Julius Caesar, which helped them overcome everything in their way. But eventually, they couldn’t keep up. A series of unbeatable objects came their way, and eventually, it caused their entire Empire to rapidly decline and collapse. There have been multiple different questions…

Words 878 - Pages 4

Should Brutus Join The Conspiracy Research Paper

to the Roman Republic. Brutus was a staunch defender of Roman values and traditions, and he believed that Caesar's growing power threatened the very foundation of the Republic. By joining the conspiracy, Brutus may have seen himself as protecting the Republic from tyranny and ensuring the continuation of democratic ideals. Brutus was motivated by a genuine concern for the welfare of the Roman people. He believed that Caesar's ambition and desire for absolute power could lead to the downfall of Rome…

Words 388 - Pages 2

Fall Of Roman Empire Essay

To this day, the Roman Empire was one of the vastest and most immense empires the western world has ever seen. The fall of the once gigantic empire is a widely discussed era amongst modern day historians. There continues to be debate about the catalysts for the downfall of Rome. Despite this, research indicates that there are perhaps three main aspects that prompted the empire’s deterioration. The empire was so vast and expansive that the government could not communicate quickly enough and provide…

Words 693 - Pages 3

Myth Of Romulus Research Paper

It is common for people to say that “Rome wasn’t built in a day” as a quote of encouragement, yet many people do not understand fully how true this saying is. The Roman Empire took centuries to build and went through periods of kingships, republics, and emperors throughout those years. In The Myth of Romulus it is said that two brothers decided to create their own city after defeating the cruel king of Alba, but fought over where to build it. Eventually this led to an argument and Romulus ended up…

Words 656 - Pages 3

Michael Parenti's The Assassination Of Julius Caesar

Historians say that it is likely he said nothing at all. He also had many more conspirators for his death than the eight that were in Shakespeare’s play. Like the character in the play, the real Julius Caesar was a political leader in the Roman Republic, which predates the Roman empire. Caesar had arrived for a Senate meeting with his peers and fellow Senate members. Unbeknownst to Caesar, there was an assassination plot underway from those he had worked with, resulting in being stabbed twenty-three times…

Words 924 - Pages 4

How Did Julius Caesar Destabilize Rome

The Roman Republic, 509 BC to 27 BC, was governed using a democratic framework where elected officials, known as Senators, administered the business of the state. Rome was in a state of flux, transitioning from the deposed Monarchy of King Superbus. The Senate was seeking stability; however, it was beset by internal and external unrest. The Senate would succumb to these stressors and Rome would eventually become an Empire ruled by a single man. Senators were aristocratic and powerful, they were able…

Words 1780 - Pages 8

Is Brutus A Tragic Hero

disgusted and the audience witnesses his greatness as he confronts his counterpart’s betrayal of values. After questioning if “great Julius bled for justice’ sake”, Brutus honorably declares that he would rather “be a dog and bay at the moon that such a Roman” who supports robbers and accepts bribes to kill Caesar (4.3.20-25). Although this dispute is shortly resolved, Shakespeare illustrates Brutus’ patriotic and honorable values that make him great. Most importantly, even Brutus’ enemies…

Words 1245 - Pages 5