Sartre View on Free Will Essays

Words: 878

Pages: 4

Open Document

Andrew Kang

11/12/10

Philosophy of Human Nature

Sartre proposes an interesting view on free will when he says, "either man is wholly determined or else man is wholly free." This quote shows us that Sartre believes that man is free to do what he wants. For Sartre, freedom is the most basic value, which renders possible all other values the way our fundamental plan precedes and grounds our small choices. In that sense freedom is the source of all values. It is not logically possible to make sense of human responsibility and notions of justice without a conception of free will. This is because it is free will that allows us as humans to choose and make the right decisions in life. According to Sartre man is responsible …show more content…
It is up to each and every individual person to be responsible and make moral decisions. As for people who deny their free will, it seems to me that they may use an external moral system as a way to moralize otherwise immoral acts. We should not practice bad faith by denying our free will. Its understandable that taking on the responsibility of ones own actions can be a lot to handle. What Sartre does is he points out the freedom we all have and shows us the social roles and moral systems we can all adopt to protect us from being accountable for our actions. It is not logically possible to make sense of human responsibility without the conception of free will. It is our free will that allows us to make moral and responsible choices. We always have a choice in doing something, but that doesn’t mean we can do whatever we want. We carry the weight of responsibility for our actions and decisions on our shoulders. Any human being can choose to use their free will in a bad way, but it comes with consequences. Any human being that wishes to deny their free will by choosing to behave in authentically cannot escape their freedom even in overwhelming

Philosophy: Meaning of Life and Worthwhile Life Essay

In this paper I will be discussing Tolstoy and Sartre views on the meaning of life by comparing and contrasting Tolstoy’s objectivism and transcendentalism and Sartre’s subjectivism and existentialism. I will later conclude why it is that Sartre’s view resonates more within myself. Tolstoy’s view on transcendentalism states that the only way for you to live a worthwhile life is if you follow God’s plan, for following God’s plan is the only way to maintain the “two ingredients”: immortality and…

Words 840 - Pages 4

Similarities Between Euthyphro And Socrates

being that we can? There’s not exactly a perfect answer since there are just so many. But, there are three people I’ll be discussing about who have very different interpretations of what it means to be the “best” human being that we can be: Jean-Paul Sartre, Martin Luther, and Socrates. From the reading of “Euthyphro”, there is a discussion between two men, Socrates and Euthyphro. Euthyphro comes to Socrates with questions of uncertainty and wants confirmation of what he should do about the prosecution…

Words 1154 - Pages 5

Essay on Phil Exam 2

Human nature – Different Views Traditional rationalist view of human nature: Man is a rational animal Man’s possession of a rational soul implies he is different in KIND and in DEGREE from the rest of the animal kingdom. Evidence: Only man can understand the nature of things Only man philosophizes Only man engages in scientific reasoning and research to understand the nature of the natural world Both animal and man can perceive the moon, but only man understands what the moon is and invented the…

Words 753 - Pages 4

Module 3 Reading Questions

Logical positivism came about around the 1920’s in Vienna; this philosophical movement was characterized by its view that real scientific knowledge can only be obtain through factual knowledge. The logical positivist refuted the idea of metaphysics. Moreover, logical positivist held that the experimentation and confirmation can be the only basis for knowledge, not…

Words 1002 - Pages 5

Essay on Philosophy Culminating Report

notions on the topic are Søren Kierkegaard, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Friedrich Nietzsche. Kierkegaard was an existentialist and believed that God’s existence cannot be proved. He believed that one should have faith even if it seemed absurd (“Philosophy and the proof of God’s existence”). Sartre, an existentialist and an atheist, believed that the individual designs their own individuality by their free choices (“The Pillars of Unbelief - Sartre”). If “God makes our what, but we make our who,” then this…

Words 2444 - Pages 10

A World Without God Essay

2. Jean-Paul Sartre argues that there is still meaning in a world without God—it is just different. Work through Sartre’s argument on human nature and existentialism in a world without God and argue for or against it. Make sure and address in counter-arguments. A World Without God Many theists believe that a world without God is a world without meaning, and gives humans the excuse to ignore any moral values. Jean-Paul Sartre argues there is still meaning in a world without God, and that it…

Words 1523 - Pages 7

Kierkegaard Research Paper

experienced.” Existentialism is the philosophy emphasizing individual existence, freedom and choice. Its focus is to question human existence and that there is no purpose or explanation for existing. Therefore it believes individuals are entirely free to make choices…

Words 380 - Pages 2

The Lucifer Effect: Within Essay

December 2011 The Lucifer Effect: Within “1. We are totally free. That is, we are not determined by heredity or environment. 2. Since there is no God to define our being, we must define our essence. 3. We are completely responsible for our actions and we are responsible for prescribing a moral philosophy for everyone else too. We create our morality. 4. Because of the death of God and the human predicament, which leaves us totally free to create our values, we must exist in anguish, forlornness…

Words 2559 - Pages 11

Freedom Versus Determinism Freud Versus Sartre Essay

live by that has ultimately affected, and taken away , their freedom. This debate about whether or not we have freedom in the decisions that we make is one that Sartre and Freud both are strongly opinionated about. Freud, being a soft determinist, claims that much of what we do, especially the things that define our lives, is determined. Sartre on the other hand says that we have so much freedom that it scares us and the person in the scream is in anguish due to how…

Words 1258 - Pages 6

Dostoevsky's Rebellion

Believing that life is ultimately not worth living is the root and complete and utter lack of happiness, realizing that nothing you do, even the things that could bring you joy mean anything beyond what they immediately are is a difficult life to lead. The only way to enjoy happiness is to live under some sort of illusion, one being a leap of faith and the other, absurdity, where lack of meaning does not necessarily mean lack of reason to live “A man defines himself by his make-believe as well…

Words 1624 - Pages 7