A reason that the opposing side would give is that single-gender classes would cause less distractions for the students of the classroom. The reasoning behind this is that there is a chance that the majority of the students in the class could be attracted to each other, thus causing a distraction. Although this may be true, in a classroom environment, and also in life, there will always be distractions around you. It is expected that a student of any age will cause a disruption in the classroom, no matter what the gender is. Some other reasoning behind supporting single-gender classes is that the principle of the public school Charles Drew, states that “Studies were shown that when they starting offering the classes, the state rating went from a D to a C,”( ). This lead to the National Association for Single Sex Public Education researching and finding out that “In the 2004-05 school year, 112 public schools offered at least one single-sex class and 34 public schools served just one sex.”( ). These statistics will support single-gender classes, but on the other hand, “Research finds that single-sex education does not show significant academic benefits, or drawbacks.”( ) This statistic contradicts and proves that single-gender classes, and the distractions that come with it, will not have an effect on a student's education. Students need to be exposed to working with the other gender to prepare for real