Sex Slavery: Are People Innocent Or Unfair?

Too often, terrible things occur right below the noses of authority figures and average citizens. However, with bribery, racism, sexism, and all forms of supremacism, it begs the question: Are people everywhere really as innocent as they seem? From the cops accepting money in Happiness House in Sold to the customers bringing business to the awful industry, many let bad things slip in order to benefit. Although humanity is vast and can rarely be generalized into one statement, it is safe to say that many people often turn a blind eye to good morals when they will benefit by ignoring them. First off, Auntie Bimla and Uncle Husband ignored the immorality of sex slavery in order to further their own financial gains and benefit. Lakshmi believed …show more content…
Mumtaz paid them off every time they would come in order to continue her business. It is not as if the police did not understand sex slavery was wrong. On page 159, Shahanna tells Lakshmi, “‘Policemen are supposed to stop people like Mumtaz from selling girls,’ she says. ‘But she gives this one money each week and he looks the other way.’” The policeman does not necessarily support sex slavery, but he possibly needs the money. People often have the moral dilemma of choosing between the right choice and the easy choice. In this case, like many, he chose the easy way out. With constant income from the business, letting it continue was a win for him. He said goodbye to his morals and justice to have a little extra weight in his wallet. Whether or not this makes him a bad person is not black and white. A lot of people in the same position as the cop would do the same thing. Depending on the cop’s personal situation, there could have been more of a reason as to why he accepted money from Mumtaz. Although it seems unlikely, an event similar to this is the 1919 World Series between the White Socks and the Reds. The White Socks were by far the favorite but many rooted for the Reds instead. TheSportster.com writes, “In an eight game series, the Reds would win 5-3, as several of the White Sox players had said they took money to throw the series in Cincinnati’s favor.” Although the players knew throwing the game was wrong, they found a greater benefit in breaking the rules anyway. Lives were not jeopardized because of this series of baseball game, but the players had the same moral dilemma as the policeman. Both had the choice between either doing the right thing, or making money. With so many different possible scenarios of this same moral dilemma, it is

Show More

Human Trafficking Research Paper

Cumulative Reflective Essay

Scottsboro Boys Research Paper

Essay Just Dark Enough 20

second sex Essay

Sociological View on Deviance and Drug Use Essay

Gp Essay Mainpoints