Should Judges Have Term Limits

Words: 154

Pages: 1

A federal judge can be removed from office by impeachment only. They have lifetime appointment and can only get the job if appointed by the current president of the United States. A State Judge on the other hand can sit for a 4 to 6 year term. They can either be appointed by the state Governor, elected by the people. By all means I agree that all judges should have term limits and should be appointed and reelected after their term is up. The commander- in- chief should possess the ability to appoint a judge. The Governor has the necessary knowledge and skills to know who is capable of doing the job. As likewise, a citizen should be given the right to choose a candidate that they feel would uphold the constitution and bring forth justice.

Show More

Life Tenures Pros And Cons

Article III of the Constitution states, “The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior . . ."1 Based off of this statement in the Constitution, it is clear that the Framers’ intention was to have the judges in the judicial branch to serve life tenures to remain completely independent from political influence. But the 21st century culture that we are living in has changed radically from the culture that the Framers had molded the Constitution around…

Words 1458 - Pages 6

Guilty or Not Guilty I Don't Remember Essay example

the Senate, shall appoint … Judges of the supreme Court… and which shall be established by Law”. Article III Section 1 distinguishes the term in which they will hold office. These are considered enumerated powers given to the federal government that are specifically listed in the Constitution. “[D]uring good Behaviour,” is interpreted to mean for life tenure to these appointed positions (The Constitution of the United States). Therefore, tenure given to federal judges results from the implied powers…

Words 1635 - Pages 7

Penumbra Research Paper

to a negative result in the formation and future understanding of this rule of law. In regards to the earlier example of the stroller potentially being considered a “vehicle”, upon further analysis of the term “vehicle”, there are many different contexts of the word to consider. Either the judge takes the most common meaning of the word in its ordinary non-legal context, as ordinary civilians would understand the meaning of the word,…

Words 1370 - Pages 6

Essay about Law and Unlimited Discretion

The Criminal Justice Process Explained Student: John Stevens American Public University System Instructor: Professor Clark June 10th, 2014 Introduction The criminal justice system is typically made of the judges, correctional services, police, prosecutors and juries. In the contemporary world, social control and order would be unattainable without the criminal justice institutions. The criminal justice systems, practices and institutions are usually government owned and they bring…

Words 1773 - Pages 8

The Courts' Effect on Parliamentary Sovereignty (UK) Essay

A. V. Dicey provides a definition of parliamentary sovereignty which maintains that the courts as an institutional body have no right to interfere with parliament’s power to make any law.1 By contrast, the dicta in Jackson2 implies a shifting attitude of the judges away from this traditional definition towards a limited sovereignty. This essay will aim to establish whether parliamentary sovereignty is now at threat from the judiciary, firstly by exploring the implications of the comments made in…

Words 1685 - Pages 7

Why Is The Sixth Amendment Important

Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights to criminal prosecutions in federal courts. It gives the accused the right to a speedy and public trial with an impartial jury. It’s deemed that these rights are essential and important. The Eighth Amendment limits excessive bail, unnecessary fines imposed and most importantly prohibits the practice of cruel and unusual punishment. These two amendments deal with courts, suitable punishments and ensures that all American citizens accused of a crime are guaranteed…

Words 663 - Pages 3

Importance Of Administrative Law

Accountability ensures that a governments actions are transparent, fair and reasonable, it does this by holding those who have made a decision, responsible for that decision. If a person knows that they will be held accountable and judged on how they came to a decision then they will ensure that their actions are transparent, fair and reasonable because otherwise they will have to face the consequences of their actions. It is the process of how administrative law deliver’s accountability of administrative…

Words 986 - Pages 4

The New Nation Unit Assignment: The United States Constitution

you Read and the Preamble 1. Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that effect their lives, what I prize about living in a democracy is that I have rights and everyone is supposed to be treated equally. 2. The five purposes of the constitution are to Establish Legitimacy, create appropriate structures, describe and distribute power, limit government powers, and allow for change. 3. The constitution has 7 articles and 27 amendments…

Words 869 - Pages 4

Richard Prince Appropriation

paintings titled “Carnel Zone” that used 30 images of Cariou’s work and generated over 10 million for Prince. The initial decision by the first judge on the case was in favour of Cariou, but was later turned to the favour of Prince by an appeals court. It is said that out of the 30 paintings/collages that 25 are protected by fair use and the other 5 will have a separate hearing to determine what happens. This can be a bit controversial because Tuyman did something very similar to what Prince has and…

Words 2321 - Pages 10

Essay On Branches Of Government

appoint judges for the Judicial branch. The…

Words 692 - Pages 3