Social Darwinism, which emerged in the second half of the 19th century, attempted to apply into society biological bases like the survival of the fittest. They were literalists of Charles Darwin’s work: they argued against biologically “weak” individuals that should be eradicated from society in order to make it stronger. With this kind of thoughts in mind, eugenics movements, racism, and even Nazism raised upon these thinkers. To contradict this kind of positions, I think the definition of “strength” for an individual in a society is not necessary biological strength. In fact, as I said before, an open mind and social adaptability are the strength an individual needs to be an integrated member of a