Sutton used this case as a prime example of how the law works in an everyday way. There are significant court cases of mass importance which attract a lot of attention and then there are some smaller disputes like Rogers case that may seem unimportant to most, but to the law sociologist this case may have important social ramifications that affect people’s daily lives that are often overlooked by most. The Rogers case brought up questions about the different kinds of rules and laws used to help determine the outcome of her case and why the judge valued some rules as law more than others. How the interpretation of law comes into play during cases and how the judge must determine when it’s appropriate to constitute something as being …show more content…
Sociologists want to understand why the legal world works in the way it does and how it ended operating in that fashion. It’s far from being by the book or jurisprudence. They are less concerned with law ideas and concepts. Sociologists examine patterns of human behavior and want to know ways some groups act differently from one another and how they interact with one another in social settings. Most organizational structures have set hierarchies and roles with more power than others that shape our behavior. They see law as a bigger part of culture and more as an institution with a set of expectations that are sacred. Social institutions have a set of rules that operate on what is generally accepted and require different types of research or methods to get as close as possible to the