There have been complaints that it has been used for ethnic profiling, which targets specific individuals in the city and the country. For the critics of the policy, they feel that it is applied selectively, and only targets certain communities perceived to pose a security threat, even if they are not. In this precept, it raises serious concerns about racial profiling that only targets specific people. It is said to extend the space for illegal stops and the infringement of the privacy …show more content…
The people who oppose the policy asset that it has done nothing in reducing robbery and other crime and considers it a pointless act of the police. They add that it has reduced the value of real estate and business functions as people are subjected to open discrimination than uniting them for the better course of developing the country. For example, President Scott Stringer of Manhattan Borough has openly said that it is only a program, which targets the Latino Americans and the blacks by harassing them inexplicably. Even though supporters like Paul J. Browne feel that it has helped to ascertain security and peace in the city of New York, it has been faulted for only playing out on the targeted group than the square