Organizations that do not plan on investing in a new market are still affected by change at multiple levels. Modern environmental factors that contribute to the uncertainty may not have the same importance to each business. Terrorism, war, disease, currency fluctuations and oil price instability would be regarded as important factors in the airline industry, whilst and technological innovation and interest rates would matter to a small IT company looking to expand. The majority of companies are now affected by industry turbulence such as: greater product multiplicity, shorter planning horizons, innovation, production cycles and new entrants. This said, McNamara, Vaaler and Devers (2003) claim in their research that dynamic change and hypercompetion are no stronger now than they were in the past, the evidence they use to support this theory is that there has been little shift in the stability pattens of business performance. They refer to the idea of ‘hindsight bias’ (Fischoff, 1975; Wood, 1978) to explain why individuals perceive present events as less logical and stable compared to the past. The problem with this theory is that business performance is determined by a multitude of other factors other than the external environment, even Porter only considers that 19% of a firm’s profitability is accounted for by the state of the industry whereas 31% is attributed by the firm itself and the remaining 50% by “other factors”. Hypercompetition can be viewed from two opposite points of view, while some may argue that competing globally has produced a larger number of competitors others may consider that this is a least proportional to the