The book talks about psychotherapy as a treatment method for DID on page 289. The book states that it is the typical treatment and it works by helping the person work through the trauma. Something the book talk about that the article does not, except in the example with Kerry, is that DID is believed to be caused by abuse. Since abuse, usually as a child, is the etiology of DID a therapeutic approach is taken based off of the posttraumatic theory. The main point of the article was to say that patients with DID need to be taken with caution and the book agree with that statement. The book also goes even further in saying that reports need to take caution when saying a case was successful. I relate the video and the article more together than the book and the article. In the video you see an individual with DID and some of there alters. Helen had alters that like to committed self harm as well as had attempted suicide. I feel that Helen would benefit greatly from psychotherapy because it would help her with her search as to why she developed DID. As well as it could possible help her alters to stop harming Helen. I say this because I feel that if her alters talked with a therapist about why they harm Helen that the therapist could work through the issue with them. I know that sounds easier than it would actually be and might not even be possible. The article and book both discuss that many people with DID do not want full integration of their identities. Helen for example said she did not want to lose her identities because she would miss them. I did not comment earlier in the paper about what the article says about co-integration because I felt it was just informative as to what co-integration and full integration are. I do agree with the article that you must keep an open mind whether the DID client