Supreme Court Case Analysis

Words: 631

Pages: 3

Open Document

The Court said that even though the interaction between the Judicial and Executive Branch seems burdensome, there needs to be overlapping when there is an issue raised on on whether it is constitutional. On account of, that each branch checks each other's action as it is written in the Constitution. In example, the Court has “the authority to determine whether the President is acting within the law. Therefore, the Court held that the doctrine of separation of powers does not require federal courts to stay all private actions against the President until he leaves office” (Clinton at 243). In addition, the Court felt that the decision the District Court decision was not suitable. The reason being that the respondent filed her claim within the statutory period allowed. If, the case would be delayed it “would increase the danger of prejudice resulting from the loss of evidence, including the inability of witness to recall specific facts, or the possible death of a party” (Clinton at 244). The Supreme Court felt that the District Court unnecessary gave too much concern to the notion that a trial would disturb the President from conducting his presidential duties. …show more content…
The Court did not worry about the risks. The “availability of sanctions provides a significant deterrent to litigation directed at the President in his unofficial capacity for purposes of political gain or harassment” (Clinton at 244). Moreover, if the legislative branch did not like the Court decisions they may respond with a statue if they felt that the President needed stronger protection. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court’s decision was not asking for a statutory response form Congress for these

Analysis Of Supreme Court Cases

RIGHTS FALL SEMESTER, 2014 COURSE SYLLABUS CLASS SECTIONS Section Number Days/Times Room 29760 MWF; 8:00 – 8:50 OAB 271 29761 T – Th; 8:00 – 9:20 OAB 271 COURSE DESCRIPTION This course will focus on the analysis and evaluation of notable Supreme Court cases, together with an examination of the logic and interpretive reasoning used by its justices in making constitutional judgments. Emphasis will be placed on the historic protection of individual rights, and the ability of government…

Words 7388 - Pages 30

Supreme Court Case Analysis

my Supreme Court case summaries (especially in cases like Marbury, Dred Scott, Bush v. Gore and Citizens United), it could be argued that the Supreme Court (at least in certain periods) decides cases more as a political matter than consistently following rigid legal rules and rationales. Having sat through multiple presentations, what are your thoughts on this issue? Do you believe the Court is apolitical or political in its rulings and why or why not? Ultimately, I do feel that the Supreme Court…

Words 585 - Pages 3

Supreme Court Case Analysis

Contemporary decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court have modified the original meaning of the Sixth Amendment. Some ways that they have done this relate to elements such as speedy and public trial, impartial jury, vicinage, confrontation, compulsory process, assistance of counsel, self-representation. Some cases in which one or more of these elements were modified via the Supreme Court contemporary decisions include, Barker v. Wingo, Sheppard v. Maxwell, Taylor v. Louisiana, Beavers v. Henkel, United…

Words 375 - Pages 2

John Adams Supreme Court Case Analysis

In the presidential election of 1800 Thomas Jefferson Defeated John Adams. Before he left office, Adams and congress passed the Judiciary act of 1801 which added judges, created more courts and gave the president more control over the appointment of judges. Adams used this act to frustrate his republican predecessor by appointing federalists in order to preserve his party’s control of the judiciary. William Marbury was appointed Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia. Although he had been…

Words 625 - Pages 3

Glossip V. Gross Supreme Court Case Analysis

Civil Liberty: No Cruel or Unusual Punishments The American Constitution bars “cruel and unusual punishment,” but the Glossip v. Gross Supreme Court Case sheds light on the questionable grey areas of that civil liberty. On April 29, 2014, Oklahoma State Penitentiary executed Clayton Lockett using a three-drug lethal injection procedure, which included the drug midazolam. The cocktail was supposed to leave Lockett unconscious; however, he awoke after the injection only to suffer for forty minutes…

Words 1212 - Pages 5

The Pros And Cons Of Supreme Court Decision Making

The Supreme Court has the responsibility of making sure that whatever law our government wishes to pass are within the rights of every citizen and does not exceed its power. The Supreme Court make all the decisions that constitutes new law involving Congress that will go into effect as well as notifying Congress that a law it passed violate the Constitution. The judges that make these decision on behalf of the United States are individuals who will not serve one term as a justice or a brief period…

Words 686 - Pages 3

Salience Supreme Court

Salience, Support and the Perception of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court is generally regarded as the weakest branch of government despite the institution’s reputation for being legalistic, nonpartisan and apolitical. The Court’s reputation, or institutional legitimacy, relies heavily on the general public’s perception and approval of their case decisions (Nicholson and Hansford 2014; Bybee 2010; Malhortha and Jessee 2014). This being because, when the judiciary was created, it was primarily…

Words 1842 - Pages 8

Supreme Court Roles

The Supreme Court is one of the highest courts in the country. The Supreme Court's job is to understand the Constitution and make sure laws align with it. Through the power of judicial review is how the Supreme Court evaluates what the constitution says about laws and government action. They also protect U.S. citizens' rights by ensuring that other branches of government do not intrude. In this essay, we will dive into why the Supreme Court is important, examine the Supreme Court roles and analyze…

Words 630 - Pages 3

California Vs Bakke Case Summary

the State Supreme Court is to be the highest courts in the American State judicial system. The main goal of these courts is to rectify the errors made by inferior state courts in the case of an appeal. These courts listen to appeals from inferior state courts, meaning that they do not hold trial, but rather correct the decisions of trials already held. In case the Supreme Court finds that the inferior court made a grave error when looking for facts, it is the duty of the Supreme Court to demand a…

Words 1570 - Pages 7

Marbury Vs Madison Case Brief Summary

Case Name and Citation: Marbury v. Madison, (1803) Facts: The Judiciary Act of 1801 gave the president and congress at the time the ability to put judicial members into office before the new president and congress came into office. This act gave the plaintiff a position as justice of the peace for the District of Columbia. The statement of his appointment was signed by the president before he left office, approved by the senate, and the seal of the U.S. was on the letter by the secretary of…

Words 462 - Pages 2