Supreme Court of the United States and Sc Essay

Submitted By Liienzo
Words: 1606
Pages: 7
Open Document
“A political not judicial institution.” Discuss this view. (45)
There has been ongoing debate about how political the Supreme Court (SC) is. The Supreme Court can be defined as the highest court in the USA which has nine unelected judges who have been approved by the senate and nominated by the president – The sole reason why it is seen to be political? Currently Obama has made two successful appointments of Sonya Sotomayor in 2006 and Elena Kagan in 2010 and hoping to make his third nomination Sri Srinivasan in the coming months. The supreme court can be considered to have turned into a political institution rather than a judicial one because of its activism in high profile political cases which have divided views between the two major parties of America. There are some specific areas which can be analysed in order to establish an evaluation of the power of the Supreme Court. These include the constitutional role of the SC, the appointments process and how politiced it can be, judicial review and its importance, checks and balances and also the impact of pressure groups and parties.
The Founding Fathers wanted the SC to be the highest of all the courts in the judicial system of America. They therefore assigned the court to have the role of ‘guarding’ and ‘interpreting’ the constitution. Since then the court has been said to have three main jobs as written in the constitution: Supreme Court judges are to interpret federal laws, interpret the constitution and allow majority or minority rulings. The Supreme Court was set up by Article 9 and was regarded to be the most powerful body in the United States of America. One of the main examples to illustrate how powerful and politicised the SC is through the case of George W. Bush v Al Gore (2000). Through this the court had declared that recount votes which take place on the 12TH December will be unconstitutional and therefore because of this many people believe that the court handed the case to George Bush. The power of judicial review wasn’t really stated in the constitution but rather taken upon by the SC itself. This was said to be in the case of Madison v Marbury in 1803 when the court declared an act by congress unconstitutional and therefore was decided to be a violation of the constitution, thus establishing the SCs right of judicial review. The SC has also been described to be an evolved body. This means that over the years the SC and its justices have taken into account the changing society around them. A clear illustration of this would be when the court decided what the phrase ‘cruel and unusual punishments’ meant in the eighth Amendment and also decided that ‘freedom of speech’ applied not only in written form and speech but also in the internet. Moreover, critics argue that the power of judicial review gives the courts a ‘quasi-legislative’ position in the politics of America because decisions that are handed down by the court can initially be turned into a law being passed by congress for example in 1973 the case of Roe v Wade led to congress passing abortion rights and because of this position the SC has been described to be the third house of the legislative , which can be seen to unbalance the system of checks and balances showing that the SC has more power than the other branches of the government.

One of the main reasons as to why the SC is said to be a political institution is because of the nomination/ appointments process. First of all a presidential candidate will make filling vacancies on the SC an issue in their election campaigns. This is true in the cases of George Bush in 2000 and Barack Obama 2008. By doing this the presidential candidates will give an insight as to whom they may want to nominate as their SC judge which will attract both media and public attention which causes some checks done by the media which in itself is a political achievement. Also presidents may try and choose justices who will reflect their own political and judicial
Show More

Related Documents: Supreme Court of the United States and Sc Essay

Marbury Vs Madison Case

1803 which basically was featured by the Supreme Court of the United States (S.O.T.U.S), in which the court established the basis for the exercise of judicial review in the United States under Article III of the Constitution. It helped to form a separation between the constitutionally separate executive and judicial branches of the United States. However this case helps Chief Justice John Marshall to establish the power of judicial review: the power of the Court not only to interpret the constitutionality…

Words 745 - Pages 3

Andrew Jackson

approve the act -he thought it was perfect and what was right. they have their place and we have our place. -democracy- self ade men didn't extend to other races jackson- burrow of indian affairs (BIA) states began to pass laws against native americans, the cherokee nation sued, and the supreme court said they are not foreign nation the next year that was changed in worschter v. gorgeia GA had no force agint the cherokee nation jackson was not president during the trail of tears but that is what i…

Words 526 - Pages 3

PUBLIC LAW COURSEWORK Essay

and the European Communities Act 1972. The principle of the rule of law is stated by Dicey that the law is supreme, there is equality before law and that the constitution may be found in the ordinary laws of the state. “That no man is punishable or can be lawfully made to suffer in body or goods except for a distinct breach of the law in the ordinary legal manner before the ordinary Courts of the land.”3 The AXA4 case at common law is that the 2009 Act concluded an unreasonable, irrational and arbitrary…

Words 1079 - Pages 5

Legalization Marijuana Essay

Federalists: (Democrats) Believed in the need for a strong central government. Believed that the central government would protect the citizens in a way that the states couldn’t or wouldn’t. Thought that this was the only way to create a country rather than just 13 states. II. Anti-Federalists: (Republicans) Thought most power must remain with the States. Feared tyranny like the British Monarchy would result from a strong central government. Said if they were going to do this- citizens must have guaranteed…

Words 3988 - Pages 16

Reasearch paper Pharmacology Medication error

for the patient. In terms of physiological and emotionally support one might question if one out weights the other and if it did which would you choose? Unfortunately in late august 2004 Nurse Wilcox chose put her efforts solely on the psychological state of her patient and she failed to follow a standing order to provide an prophylactic antibiotic, which resulted in the subsequent infection and death of her patient Mindi Tucker following a routine caesarian section. On the day of the incident the…

Words 1675 - Pages 7

Juvenile Justice System Analysis

The Court-involved, nonincarated (CINI) make up two-thirds of the juvenile justice population (Conrad, Puzzanchera, 2009). The majority if the CINI are more at risk for recidivism because they were caught, but they were also discluded. When teenagers are not…

Words 1863 - Pages 8

Stephen Arnold Douglas Argumentative Essay

Missouri Compromise. The bill also declared the people of any state or territory are free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States. The passage of this Kansas-Nebraska Bill was one of the most momentous in its consequences ever passed by the Federal Congress and it was largely a personal triumph for Douglas. There was great annoyance throughout the free states and in Chicago, even Douglas was unable to win for himself a…

Words 1267 - Pages 6

Gun Control Pros And Cons

The general population of the United States of America are given unique rights that are ensured in the Constitution - The Supreme Law of the Land. The Second Amendment of the Constitution announces, "An all around directed Militia, being important to the security of the free express, the privilege of the general population to keep and carry weapons, might not be encroached." People may have this privilege, however promoters of firearm control trust weapons are excessively hazardous. Rivals of firearm…

Words 2541 - Pages 11

3500 Cases Essay example

property to a knew lessor/owner and Salmon entered into a new lease and did not tell Meinhard of it, when Meinhard found out he demanded the lease be held in trust as an asset of the venture and Salmon refused Meinhard sued, trial and immediate appellate court found in favor of him, Salmon continued to appeal, but the decision was affirmed. Soldano v ODaniels: Soldano was shot and killed at a saloon, across the street from a restaurant called the Circle Inn One of the patrons from the restaurant went to…

Words 2074 - Pages 9

Rahmatullah V Secretary Of State For International Law

AND SECURITY OF PERSONS DETAINED ABROAD Abstract On 31 October 2012 the Supreme Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment in Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and Secretary of State for Defence [2012] UKSC 48. The case concerns an application for habeas corpus brought by a citizen of Pakistan originally detained by the United Kingdom in Iraq before being transferred into the custody of the United States. Rahmatullah addresses important issues concerning the extraterritorial…

Words 7655 - Pages 31