On one hand, some argue that teen driving laws are too strict. On the other hand, others argue that the laws give to much freedom to the new drivers. Neither of these arguments fully address the issue; however, this paper will consider both sides of the argument. Moreover, this paper will examine why a GDL system is necessary and recommend each state has one in place. Legislation in Nebraska are concerned with teen driving, so the policy makers have put in place a new regulation for teens to get their license. The results supported by the Nebraska legislation change into a three stage process show, in the study the population was, 80,685 (53.1%) teens (Paul, 8). In year one of driving following the POP, 18,097 teens (11.9%) had a crash and 3568 teens (2.3%) had an injury or fatal crash (Paul, 8). These results show that the strict three stage process helps save inexperienced drivers and make teen driving safer. The fatal accidents all came from the teen’s neglect of the laws implemented to insure the safety of all on the road. The fatal accidents contributing factors all occurred due to underage drinking and having more than one person in the car. Paul declares within his article that these regulations and laws put in place should change the mind of parents, who believe teen driving laws are too lenient. The results from the experiment show a small percentage of …show more content…
However, my experience suggests that researching crash reports in an area uncovers more. Moreover, some research confirms that the laws are neglected and this may be the reason for the arguments. Crash data reports were expressed as a rate per 100 licensed drivers in each year. Williams found that putting in place stricter graduated driver-licensing law in Massachusetts helped decrease accidents. One stricter law was, new penalties for unsupervised night driving which could result in the suspensions of a learners permit (Lyon 30). The rate of overall and night police-reported crashes decreased 28.8 percent, for drivers ages 16–17. These are typically average for drivers ages 20 and older who tend to be more experienced. The rate of crashes involving a fatalities or injury fell by 39.8 percent for the drivers 16-17(Lyon 30). The significant decline in crash rates observed in time-series analysis provides strong evidence that implementation of the new law was causally related to the observed changes in crash