Terry V Ohio

Submitted By davidmai408

Words: 384

Pages: 2

Open Document

David Mai
JS 143
4/8/2015

Brief: Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
Facts: While patrolling on a downtown beat in Cleveland, detective Martin McFadden observed two men who were standing in the corner of the street. They repeatedly walked up and down the same street, while constantly looking through a store window. After stopping and chatting with one another, they began walking up and down the street again, observing the same store window. A third man joins, but left after a brief conversation. Detective McFadden believed that the men were “casing” the store for a potential robbery, so he approached and questioned the two. Due to the totality of the circumstance and the reasonable suspicion, McFadden did a quick search (frisk) of the petitioner and found a concealed weapon in the outside pockets of his jacket. He was later charged with having a concealed weapon, in which he appealed.
Issues: Did detective McFadden violate Mr. Terry’s 4th amendment rights by doing a quick search (frisk) without probable cause?
Procedures: John Terry appealed the decision. He claimed that his 4th amendment rights were violated since it “protects the people” from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Held: No, The courts affirmed the conviction.
Reasoning/Analysis: Although Mr. Terry and his accomplice didn’t commit any crimes, but were acting very suspicious, it is a police officer’s job to investigate suspicious activity. Detective McFadden had reasonable suspicion that a crime was going to

Terry V. Cortez Argumentative Essay

With respect to the ruling in Terry v. Ohio, police officers are authorized to conduct “a brief investigatory stop of an individual when there is reasonable and articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.” A justifiable reasonable suspicion should take into consideration the complete scene and circumstances, just like it was ruled in United States v. Cortez in 1981. The Court held that the totality of the circumstances should be taken into consideration before conducting an investigatory…

Words 725 - Pages 3

Terry V. Ohio Case Study

The case of Terry v. Ohio has been a landmark case that had gone before the Supreme Court in 1968. The courts state that an officer must have a reasonable suspicion that a driver or an individual has committed a crime or an intentional act to do so and must be able to have articulable facts that a crime may be committed by that individual, which warrants the officer from stopping an individual to investigate further. Yet, there are time that officers who make a judgement call to pull over an individual…

Words 2454 - Pages 10

Supreme Court Case: The Terry V. Ohio Case

The Terry v. Ohio case set a precedent for a number of Supreme Court cases that took place in the following years. The “terry frisk” caused a multitude of problems for future people dealing with law enforcement. Every day citizens have to become more cautious when being around a cop because as long as they give the officer a reason to think they will cause harm, the officer has every right to pat down the suspect. The most common cause of the cases is people not cooperating with the police officers…

Words 745 - Pages 3

Kel Mos Essay

Terry v. Ohio Decision: 8 votes for Ohio, 1 vote(s) against Legal provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment “In an 8-to-1 decision, the Court held that the search undertaken by the officer was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and that the weapons seized could be introduced into evidence against Terry. Attempting to focus narrowly on the facts of this particular case, the Court found that the officer acted on more than a "hunch" and that "a reasonably prudent man would have been warranted…

Words 1693 - Pages 7

4th Amendment Essay

the court came across Terry v. Ohio where the concept of reasonable suspicion originated from. The actions based on reasonable suspicion have to be articulated well for them to be permissible. Although probable cause was already there to allow police…

Words 764 - Pages 4

Broken Windows Theory

essay on are (1) the Terry v. Ohio case, which elaborates on the stop and frisk policy and (2) Broken windows theory. Both topics are discussed in Chapters 1, 4, and 6 of Burns. Terry v. Ohio: Stop and Frisk Policy Website Source In Chapter 1: The Police: An Introduction, court case Terry v. Ohio is briefly discussed. This case caused the Supreme Court to reexamine the Fourth Amendment’s protection of unlawful search and seizures. In 1968 the federal class-action lawsuit, Terry v. Ohio established…

Words 1192 - Pages 5

Argumentative Essay: Warren Court And The 4th Amendment

from the Terry decision. David Rudovsky identifies examples of racial profiling that forced unbearable situations on minorities. From detaining and searching individuals solely because of their race, to forcing laxatives down a pregnant black woman’s throat, the Terry decision contradicts the Warren Court’s perceived liberalism. The Warren Court believed that any violations of their Terry stop criteria could be remedied in a judicial proceeding. The court’s logic is unrealistic. The Terry decision…

Words 3492 - Pages 14

Case Study: Faragher V. City Of Boca Raton

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case that revolved on the liabilities of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The case came into effect after petitioner Beth Ann Faragher resigned as a lifeguard concerning the City of Boca Raton after bringing to the attention of the city that her supervisors, Bill Terry and David Silverman created a sexually hostile atmosphere at work and committed acts of sexual harassment. The sexually hostile atmosphere…

Words 622 - Pages 3

Arrest Vs Terry Stop

1) Explain the differences between an arrest and a Terry stop. • A Terry stop is for a fairly short duration and that the detention will be no longer than necessary to effectuate the purpose of the detention. During a Terry stop the officer may only pat-down the individual for presence of weapons and only if the office has reasonable suspicion that the individual may be a danger to the officer or others. For a formal arrest there must be probable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has…

Words 746 - Pages 3

4th Amendment Research Paper

increase their chances of a conviction. Search and seizure is a very broad subject when it comes to law enforcement; it is also an important topic that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on in several incidents. An important case to elaborate on is the Mapp v. Ohio case; this was a landmark case in criminal procedure. The U.S. Supreme court decided that the evidence obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment may not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts. The circumstances of this case…

Words 1544 - Pages 7