The Controversy: The Role Of Supreme Courts In Politics

Words: 590
Pages: 3

The supreme court is not directly elected by the people, as policymakers are, and yet has a disproportionate amount of power in determining the political direction of U.S. legislation. This causes bitter conflicts over the nomination of supreme court justices and allows the most powerful interest groups and the media to bypass the legislature and effect change at a federal level. Nevertheless a strong judiciary is necessary to balance the legislative and executive powers and must remain as independent and impartial as possible in order to do so, The power of the supreme court not only to apply but also to review and overrule legislation has grown exponentially in the past 50 years, effectively turning judges into unelected political actors. In the last decade alone the supreme court has taken up delicate political issues concerning separation of powers, abortion and the war on terror, and has even determined the outcome of a presidential election in Bush v Gore. This “judicialization of politics”, an attempt to ensure the fundamental rights granted in the constitution, has given the judiciary, the power to decide on critical political matters, central to society, despite it’s being a non-majoritarian entity and despite this power not …show more content…
Each president has attempted to “pack the courts”, from FDR to Reagan, with varying degrees of success. In 2005, for example, when Republicans held both the senate and the presidency, Bush’s nomination of judges Samuel Alito and John G. Roberts fundamentally altered the balance of the supreme court, compromising the supposed “impartiality” of the judiciary. Similarly, interest groups and corporations lobby senators to “advise and consent” to the appointment of conservative or liberal