The Cosmological Argument

Words: 705
Pages: 3
Open Document
The cosmological arguments to prove the existence of god are defined as “Arguments that try to show that from the fact that the universe exists, God exists,” (Vaughn 58). In summary, this argument says that “There must be a first uncaused cause of everything,” (Vaughn 58). The argument implies that the “First uncaused cause is God,” (Vaughn 58). The cosmological argument handles the problem of evil with the thought that if evil exists, then God must have set it into motion. God allows “evil to exist and bring good out of it is part of God’s infinite goodness, (“The Cosmological”). Overall, individuals do not have to understand evil completely, God sees a greater good from the existence of evil.
The teleological arguments to prove the existence …show more content…
In addition to these two arguments, there is one argument against the existence of God, the argument from evil. The argument from religious experience says “That a person seems to have experienced God; the experience must have actually been a genuine encounter with God; therefore, God probably exists,” (Vaughn 59). Belief without reason is based on the idea that if believing in God brings invaluable benefits. Vaughn explains an argument of pragmatic faith by Williams James, “That sometimes we may be justified in making a leap of faith to embrace a belief that is entirely unsupported by evidence,” (Vaughn 96). Both of these arguments handle the problem of evil with the soul-making defense by John Hick, that is “Evil in the form of suffering is necessary to provide humans with a world where moral and spiritual progress is possible,” (Vaughn 85). In summary, both arguments believe that evil is needed to merit growth with God. The argument from evil to disprove the existence of God is defined as “An argument purporting to show that since there is unnecessary evil, an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God must not exist,” (Vaughn 60). Overall, this argument aims to disprove the existence of God from the view that if God is omnipotent, omnipresent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient, then there cannot be so much unnecessary evil in world. The argument from evil handles the problem of evil two parts, necessary and unnecessary. Necessary is pain and suffering that is needed to bring about a greater good, while unnecessary is pain and suffering without reason (Vaughn
Show More

Related Documents: The Cosmological Argument

The Cosmological Argument Essay

The Cosmological Argument The Cosmological Argument simply proposes the argument, that God is the creator of the universe and without God there would be nothing. This argument is the simplest of all arguments as it begins with the simple fact that there is a universe. With this provided it means there are various different strengths and weaknesses put forward for this argument leading on to a final conclusion to the end to decide if this argument successfully proves the existence of God. The…

Words 957 - Pages 4

The Cosmological Argument Essay

Cosmological Argument- Basic essay plan layout INTRODUCTION * One of the oldest arguments for the existence of God * Based on experience that everything has a cause- a poseriori * Its premises are drawn from experience, not from analytical truths, and reach an inductive conclusion, that is, one which may possibly be correct, but is not logically necessary * It moves on the assumption that the universe must have a first cause – a priori * Originates from the thinking of Aristotle…

Words 542 - Pages 3

Cosmological Argument Essay

features of the cosmological argument for the existence of God. The cosmological argument comes from the Greek ‘cosmos’ meaning universe. It is one of the oldest arguments that attempts to prove the existence of God. It does this based on the starting point that there is a universe, and seeks to prove why there is a universe rather than nothingness. It takes the form of an a posteriori argument. This means that it is inductive and so based on experience. It is also a synthetic argument, meaning that…

Words 1304 - Pages 6

Cosmological argument essay

“Explain Aquinas’ cosmological argument” The cosmological argument or first cause argument is that everything has a cause, causal chains cannot be infinite, and so there must be an uncaused cause at its origin. It is a posteriori argument (knowledge gained after experience) which attempts to prove that there is a rational basis for the belief in God. Christian philosopher St Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) came up with the cosmological argument not to prove the existence of God but rather solidify his…

Words 507 - Pages 3

Cosmological Argument Analysis

Cosmological Argument and Principle of Sufficient Reason The Cosmological Argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God and claims all things in the world depends on the something else for their existence. The Principle of Sufficient Reason is an explanation that everything that exist in the universe must have a reason or cause behind the existence. The Principle of Sufficient Reason states that everything must be either dependent or self- existent. If the universe is dependent…

Words 611 - Pages 3

Cosmological Argument Essays

religion in the future? In this short essay I will be looking at the arguments for and against the existence of God relevant to the cosmological argument. There are many arguments for and against God; therefore I am going to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the cosmological argument. The question of God’s existence is one of the perennial features of the philosophical landscape. The cosmological argument is a posterior argument which allows the human mind to locate God beyond this universe as…

Words 653 - Pages 3

Essay On Cosmological Argument

I find that the Cosmological Argument is flawed in a couple of ways. For instance it doesn’t really help people believe that God exist especially for those who are nonbelievers. Telling a person that God exist because he is the most powerful being therefore he has to exist, is rubbish. On account of the fact that many skeptics will not believe in something that they have never seen by just saying the previous statement. As well as for those who believe in scientific evidence, like Evolution or The…

Words 874 - Pages 4

The Cosmological Argument Analysis

The cosmological argument endeavors to prove God’s existence by observing the universe around us. These kind of arguments originated with Plato and have been used by distinguished philosophers and theologians ever since. Scientist eventually caught up with them in the 20th century, when it was established that the universe must have had a beginning. So, the cosmological argument is even more influential among Christians and non-philosophers today. It starts with what is most certain in reality:…

Words 708 - Pages 3

Cosmological Argument For God's Existence

The cosmological argument is a strong argument for Gods existence. This argument is a series of arguments that all attempt to demonstrate the existence of sufficient reason or first cause of the existence of the cosmos. There are three different groups for this argument, the Kalam cosmological argument for a First Cause of the beginning of the universe, the Thomas cosmological argument for a sustaining Ground of Being of the world, and the Leibnizian cosmological argument for a Sufficient reason…

Words 296 - Pages 2

Cosmological Argument Research Paper

main arguments that each seek to prove the existence of God; the Ontological, Cosmological, and Teleological Arguments. The three are different in their approaches, but all arrive at the same conclusion. Ontological Argument argues God’s existence from the assumption of the existence a “Greatest thing that can ever be conceived.” From there, it argues that in order for something to be “The greatest thing ever” it must exist physically (that is outside of the mind). The Cosmological Argument argues…

Words 1729 - Pages 7