Board of Education case. They had a unanimous vote that “separate but equal” is inherently unequal. This case came about because the African American schools at the time were not great schools for children to attend. They had old textbooks, broken down schoolhouses, and untrained teachers. While the African Americans were having trouble with their school system the white population was way ahead. When the case, Brown vs. Board of Education was brought to the Supreme Court they voted in favor of those that were trying to improve and follow the American Dream. Similar to the DREAM Act, Brown vs. Board of Education allowed many people to pursue a higher education despite their status. At the University of Alabama, African American students were trying to attend and they were blocked from entering the school because of their race. They were led into the school by armed guards due to the president’s order. America has always tried to help the underprivileged when it comes to education. Integrating African Americans and Caucasian people into the same schools was successful and both parties have benefited. In this case the United States government has succeeded in helping out the less fortunate obtain an education so that they may live the American dream. Brown vs. Board of Education repealed the Plessy vs. Ferguson case that stated “separate but equal” was good. In about fifty years America had changed its …show more content…
The DREAM Act is comparable to the fourteenth amendment in the fact that it gives citizenship to those that had no choice in coming to America. Also it is very similar to the Brown vs. Board of Education case because it gives equal rights to education for all people in America. The DREAM Act is old legislation that is addressing a new problem. The problems that arise from the DREAM Act are inconsequential because they can only bring help to America. Seats taken away in classes only allow those that took those seats to become citizens and give back to the country by becoming teachers, lawyers, or doctors. And the argument that it is incentive for more families to come to America is not valid because it would only help those that are under sixteen and have attended three years of high school. Also the immigrants must be in good standing with the government to qualify for the DREAM