The giver society controls careers with ease but do they consider what people may want. On page 19 Jonas’s father says” I was fairly certain of what my assignment was to be.” When Jonas’s father says he was fairly certain of what he was to be, however this confused Jonas because he volunteered at many different places and wasn’t drawn to one. The society is seen controlling careers on page 76 when the Chief Elder says” Jonas has been selected to be the receiver of memory.” Although the society holds this as a very high position Jonas still is scared and worried even though, the society is praising him because he expected he would be a nurturer. When Jonas is chosen to be the receiver the society has again shown how they are the overlords the power and all the citizens are there pawn being played into what the elders want. This shows how the society controls careers without consulting the citizens about what they want. …show more content…
They Giver society shows this on page 16 when Jonas’s father says” He is to be named Gabriel.” This is a horrible thing in our society to chose names by a lottery. By not letting the birthmother chose the names shows how much they control names and how the society can’t have more the one name. On page 15 again Jonas’s father says” … I looked to see if this year’s names had been made yet.” Again there is a list of what the children’s names are to be which shows how they don’t have faith that the family can chose a name for their child. The families also don’t want to have a daughter named plum or peach but the society thinks that those are names made for fruit and or people. The Giver shows how names can be controlled with a name out of a hat and never looking