In the first place, the memo mentioned that the Good Taste Company is the second expensive one, while no evidence is shown that whether this could have a negative impact on their business. Maybe, many individuals trust their performance because of the quality of …show more content…
While, it is nebulous that whether this experience came from the performance of the Good Taste company or other factors such as the space of the cafeteria. Or, it is unreasonable to consider three employees as the representation of all. So, this assumption is unpersuasive.
Lastly, experiencing just one food by only one person is not a reliable basis to judge about the high quality of other kinds of offering food in a company. Moreover, it is mentioned that some part of the menu was variable, while it was not provided any evidence showing the overall variability of all foods in a comparison with the Good Taste company’s menu. Thus, this should be provided to lend the credibility of the assumption.
In conclusion, the argument lacks prominent evidence to make me persuasive. An evidence shows the impact of the company’s expensive menu on their business, and to show that their menu is more expensive that the suggested Discount company is necessary. An evidence to show the capability of the Discount company in offering special diet menu is necessary. A demographic data to show the rate of satisfaction of representative number of employees experiencing the Good Taste company and also a evidence showing the variability of whole of two companies in comparison are