The Hobbit Book Vs Movie

Words: 649
Pages: 3

A picture most certainly is worth a thousand words, that is why the invention of movies and other TV related things have be welcomed by people all over the world. TV has truly proven the ability to bring a image of thought into an physical, visible image and creates a common thing for people who view that to talk about, weather good or bad. Just as most movies based on books, The Hobbit- An unexpected Journey produced by Peter Jackson, though it may depict hundreds of visible images and scenes, cannot do its written guideline justice.
Throughout the movie, we may begin to wonder if the title, An unexpected Journey was coincidently used to describe how we felt about the unexpectedness of a three movie series coming out of a simple Book, or if it was just referring to the movie itself. Multiple times throughout the film it was hard to tell if Peter Jackson had just read a different version of the book, and that would account for all the added and unnecessary information he provided in the film. Why does he take so much time away from the focus of Bilbo (Martin Freeman) in order to refocus his film on Azog (Manu Bennett), when the orc was only made mention of and only very slightly at that.
…show more content…
Because hobbits aren’t much of an adventurous people and try to keep more to themselves, Bilbo gets upset to find his house full of Dwarves which were summoned by a wizard named Gandalf (Ian Mckellen). He is more upset when he finds out what they want from him and he refuses to have anything to do with it. But his curious nature takes hold and he eventually finds himself chasing down the dwarven party in order to join them and help them take back what they describe as “rightfully” theirs. Dangerous, yet exciting adventures involving near death encounters with Goblins, and giant wolves soon