The Missouri Compromise

Words: 698
Pages: 3
Open Document
Slavery contributed to the growing tension between the North and South. Many events explain the rage between North and South, and how they interacted with each other.

The Missouri Compromise was a compromise between the North and South. The compromise allowed a new state to enter as a free state if it was above the northern border of Arkansas. If a new state was added above the northern border of Arkansas, a state had to come into the south as a slave state if it was under the northern border of Arkansas. The compromise was to help keep the balance in the states equal. The North and South were both upset for different reasons. The North was angry because Congress had allowed slavery to expand into other states. The South was upset because …show more content…
The Compromise was supposed to give the supporters and opponents of slavery a part of what they wanted. The South was happy because they had finally been given their property rights. Unlike the South, the North were outraged because they felt that fugitive slaves were being deprived of their freedom. In 1852, Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote a novel about a young, enslaved man who was abused by his owner. Stowe was an abolitionist, and wrote this book with her first hand experience. Uncle Tom’s Cabin was the best-selling book of 1852, and opened up eyes of Northerns. Northerners realized that slavery was not just a political conflict.The Northerners felt that this was a human, moral problem facing every American . The Southerners had felt that it was propaganda, and the book didn’t give an accurate picture of the enslaved lives of African Americans .

On May 22, 1856, Senator Charles Sumner (anti-slavery) was attacked in the Senate Chamber by Preston Brooks (pro-slavery) after giving his speech, “The Crime Against Kansas.” In his speech, Sumner had declared Kansas a free state for slaves. Brooks was enraged byhis actions. As a result, Brooks nearly beat Sumner to death. The North felt that the incident just proved that slavery was brutal and inhuman . The South believed Sumner deserved being beaten. Southerners sent canes to Brooks to show their
Show More

Related Documents: The Missouri Compromise

Missouri Compromise

Although many compromises were in place, not every state agreed to these laws. One particular example is Kansas and Nebraska. Under the Missouri Compromise, these states were designated to free states (Doc. 3). However, both states had stirred up large protests as to whether they should be free or slave states. Kansas especially had disputes, to the point of such violence that earned the name “Bleeding Kansas” (Doc. 4). Previously, the topic of slavery was more popular in states on the eastern coast…

Words 179 - Pages 1

The Purpose Of The Missouri Compromise

If it wasn't for the Missouri Compromise, our country would have been drastically changed. In 1819, the territory that was previously known for slavery, Missouri, applied for statehood into the Union. The Missouri Compromise was necessary to maintain the structure of the United States. The three main topics that are covered in this essay are: state representatives, the state’s views on slavery, and the conclusion of the compromise. With the admission of Missouri into the Union, the southern states…

Words 434 - Pages 2

Essay On Missouri Compromise

United States government decided to pass political compromises in states that had a split intention to become a free or slave state. The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 helped reduce tensions between the North and South, but the Kansas-Nebraska Act increased sectional tensions prior to the civil war. In 1812, Missouri was bought through the Louisiana Purchase and many southerners moved into Missouri with their slaves. When Missouri petitioned the House of Representatives to become…

Words 672 - Pages 3

Missouri Compromise Essay

over the request of Missouri of wanting to become a slave state. This threatened the balance between slave and free states. The reason why was because it disrupted the balance since there was an even amount of free and slave states. As well as, it would create a precedent where congressional consensus to reluctant increase of slavery. So, to help get rid of the tension between the states, Congress created a compromise, which was known as the Missouri Compromise. In the compromise it pretty much granted…

Words 519 - Pages 3

Dbq Missouri Compromise

circumstances that resulted in the Missouri Compromise includes the Tallmadge amendment. The tallmadge amendment said that no more slave could be brought into Missouri and the gradual emancipation of children born to slaves already there. This created a tensions among the north and south. The southerners were angry with this and saw it as a threat to sectional balance and whole future of slavery. They saw it as if they abolish peculiar institution in Missouri it might do so in olders states of the…

Words 450 - Pages 2

Missouri Compromise Dbq

The Missouri Compromise was important in deciding if Missouri should be a slave state or a free state. The Missouri Compromise was a collection of agreements passed by Congress to maintain the balance of power between free states and slave states. In the end, it was decided that Missouri would representing the slave states. The Missouri Compromise basically drew a line to separate the free states from the slave states; the line was approximately 36o30’ parallel. The line basically showed that south…

Words 309 - Pages 2

The Advantages Of The Missouri Compromise

The Missouri Compromise was an effort by the U.S. to maintain a balance of power between the slave holding states and the Free states. The states with slaves were afraid of being outnumbered and lose power to protect their property and trade. The slaveholding territory of Missouri applied for admission to the union. States up north opposed the admission. The states up north had felt that the slaveholding states held too much power already. The Constitution allowed states with slaves to count each…

Words 242 - Pages 1

Essay On Missouri Compromise

other based on political favoritism, it affected the outcome on new territories. For instance, the sectional interests of the east - the North and South - reached new extremes as political actions between slave and free states in slavery. The Missouri Compromise became a the temporary resolved debate about slavery between the North and South, than conflict arose in the West about slavery. Although the West wanted their independence, they had to decide their political stance on their own than being trapped…

Words 492 - Pages 2

Why Is Missouri Compromise Necessary

The Missouri Compromise was necessary because Missouri wanted to come in as a slave state, but this would ruin the balance of free to slave states. Since Missouri was going to unbalance this ratio, this worried Thomas Jefferson. The Dred Scott Decision affected the Missouri Compromise negatively because this decision ruled that no African American will or can be an American citizen, which was obviously made the free states unconstitutional. This of course, ruined the balance.…

Words 76 - Pages 1

Missouri Compromise Research Paper

The Missouri Compromise was the legislation passed on May 9, 1820 by the 16th US Congress. This allowed Maine as a free state, and Missouri as a slave state, keeping the balance of power between North and South. Part of the compromise prohibited slavery north of the 36, 30 parallel, excluding Missouri. The legislation was signed on March 6, 1820 by President James Monroe. Prior to this, on February 4, 1819, James Tallmadge Jr. submitted two amendments to Missouri’s statehood request. This included…

Words 441 - Pages 2