This statement shows how materialistic Mme. Loisel is; she wants to impress everyone at the ball, but she does not even take the time to thank her husband for the invitation. She does not recognize how thoughtful her husband is; he gave her an invitation to a ball even though she does not try to hide her disdain. In addition, M. Loisel gave her the money to buy the dress from the money he was saving for a gun. Mme. Loisel failed to recognize her dutiful husband while she was longing for better things. The dress symbolizes the value of appreciation and gratitude. Mme. Loisel could have worn her old dress and been appreciative of the simple invitation; her ungratefulness foreshadows the trouble she will have to face. Maussapant uses the symbol of the house to show Mme. Loisel’s obsession for something better ended with something worse. For example, before Mme. Loisel lost the necklace, she “was distressed at the poverty of her dwelling, the bareness of the walls, at the shabby chairs, [and] the ugliness of the curtains” (1) . However, after she lost the necklace, “...they changed their lodgings; they rented a garret under the roof” (7)