The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

Words: 961
Pages: 4
Open Document
Harry Truman made one of the most controversial decisions in history, He made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on the Empire of Japan to effectively end World War II. Harry Truman became the vice president after Franklin Roosevelt deemed his last vice president Harry Wallace unacceptable. He became president after the death of Franklin Roosevelt after his fight with polio in April 1945. President Truman inherited a bad situation with what was going on at the time when he was inaugurated. The war in Germany was finally over but Truman still had to deal with the Russians trying to take over all of Eastern Europe and the war with Japan in the Pacific.
One of the major decisions in the decisions to drop the bombs was that the causality rate of the island hopping campaign in the pacific was steadily climbing. The Island Hopping campaign was the basis of how the United States dealed …show more content…
The United States spent an estimated $1,889,604,000 on this project and if we developed this weapon and didn’t use it, it would be seen as a waste of that much money. It also most likely struck fear into the Russians and any other country that wanted to test our dominance. Some of the cons of dropping the bomb were it did kill many Japanese people and they still have to deal with radioactive issues in the kill zone. It also went against many moral codes and it killed many non-combants on the island of Japan. Truman would have lost a lot of popularity in the United States if the public found out that he had a weapon to save American lives and he did not use it and instead sent thousands of young Americans to their
Show More

Related Documents: The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

fighting in combat with Japan. The United States began starting research and projects to plan and test potential use of atomic weapons as a means to stop Japan and end World War II. Harry Truman assumed the presidency, after the death of Franklin Roosevelt, and at the time he and his committee had an important decision to make. President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb was the right decision because alternatives would not be as successful or successful at all, it saved more lives in the…

Words 1060 - Pages 5

Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

we had to drop the bomb to get Japan to realize that we could wipe them out very easily and rapidly. In the plans beginning stages we intended to completely obliterate Japan, and destroy their docks and all other things they could use to produce war. This plan was revised on July 26 that we would only drop one bomb to show our power, and to spare to Japanese from utter destruction. I president Truman's speech he is torn between dropping in the bomb and not dropping the bomb. He does not want to…

Words 595 - Pages 3

Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons

use of the atomic bomb on Japan. On December 7th 1941, Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor. The United States could no longer remain neutral, instead the US was forced into the war. The United States then used a strategy known as Island Hopping. This strategy proved to be effective for the United States but they had to overcome many obstacles. After President Truman went over the pros and cons of his plan, he decided to end the war in August of 1945 by dropping the atomic bomb on the cities…

Words 447 - Pages 2

Why Is Harry Truman Unethical

decision to use atomic bombs to end the war with Japan. Truman decided that dropping the atomic bomb would avoid an invasion by Japan and the loss of a huge number of American citizens (Walker, 2005, p.312). Instead of a large number of the American citizens being killed, seventy five thousand Japanese citizens were killed at the instant the bomb was dropped and more tens of thousands died soon after (Hamby, 1995, p. 7). Japan was given no warning the United States was going to bomb them; therefore…

Words 805 - Pages 4

Pros And Cons Of Utilitarianism

where almost no legislation is being passed due to party politics. However if Utilitarianism were to be applied to the government, decisions would be quite easy. Maybe take an environment policy or an economic policy, the theory would analyze the pros and cons of the decision without bias to easily come up with a solution that helps the greater good. Because isn’t that what government is for? Helping the majority of people live a happy and productive life. Which is exactly what Utilitarianism would accomplish…

Words 1613 - Pages 7