John Austin states”Every law or rule is a command. Or, rather, laws or rules, properly so called, are a species of commands”(Readings, 174). He also states “A law is a command which obliges a person or persons. But, as contradistinguished or opposed to an occasional or particular command, a law is a command in which obliges a person or persons, and obliges generally to acts or forbearances of a class. In language more popular but distinct and precise, a law is a command which obliges a person or persons to a course of conduct”(Readings, 175). John Austin believes that you have a sovereign that people obey, but nobody in particular. He even states “that whoever can oblige another to comply with his wishes, is the superior of that other, so as the ability reaches The party who is obnoxious to the impeding evil, being, to that same extent, the inferior”(Readings, 175). Would this work for us here? I say no because we currently use a system, which we the people, select representatives to carry out our wishes and then we are held accountable by direct powers to be. In Austin's view, we would have a hard time knowing who was in charge. I found this that I believed presents Austin's views very well. It states “Within