What sides/groups/organizations were involved in the disagreement? The two groups that disagreed under my topic were the small states and the larger states.
What were the sides in the conflict most concerned about? They were most concerned about how their state would be represented during an election.
How can this compromise prevent future conflict? It might prevent the large states or the small states from trying to argue with the government in the future that they aren’t represented fairly.
Was this compromise simple to reach? I think the two sides could have easily stood firm in their plan, because both plans were very logical and reasonable, but instead they compromised with …show more content…
The two sides in this compromise were able to compose a conclusion with no violence, even if they could have concluded on a better way to represent each state. While the Connecticut Compromise seems to have worked out well, I believe it could have done more to represent the states better than it did. The large states had different plans than the smaller states did at the constitutional congress held at Philadelphia. The large state plan, also known as the Virginia plan was written by James Madison and purposed by Edmund J. Randolph. The Virginia plan was strongly supported by the larger states because of the resolution suggesting proportional representation. This meant that the more people who lived in your state the more representatives you would get in the legislature. The small states didn’t like that fact that they would have less representatives, which meant they would have less say in the government, which also meant they would have less power. That’s when they proposed the New Jersey plan. The New Jersey plan detailed a legislature of only one house and featured equal representation, meaning each state had the same number of