The Verdict Ethics Essay

Words: 1276
Pages: 6
Open Document
“The Verdict” is a movie that deals with medical and legal ethics. Frank Gavin is an alcoholic who hasn’t won any of his cases in the past three years. Mickey, his former partner, gives him a medical malpractice case that is sure to settle for a large amount of money. The case of Deborah Ann Kay, a mother who was given anesthetic when she had just eaten inhaled her vomit and is now in a coma. The Donaheys, her sister and brother in law are hoping for a good settlement and Frank assures them that they have a strong case. While the case is going on he meets Laura, a woman at a bar who he falls in love with. Frank goes to visit Deborah Ann Kay in the hospital and is affected by her condition. He meets with the defendants who run the …show more content…
Dr. Towler takes a Utilitarian position. He didn’t read Deborah Ann Kay’s admittance form because he was really busy. He gave her anesthesia when she had eaten within an hour before, from him doing this she inhaled vomit and is now in a coma. He had Kaitlin Costello Pryce edit the admittance form to cover his error and told her to keep quiet about it. This totally is unethical in the sense that a doctor is supposed to follow his responsibilities and procedures for every patient. It is also unethical because he tried to cover his mistake and not give Deborah Ann Kay the justice she deserved. Dr. Towler also put Kaitlin Costello Pryce in a situation she shouldn’t have had to be in and she quit being a nurse because of it.

Dr. Gruber goes from a Deontological to Utilitarian standpoint. In the beginning he was supposed to be a witness for Frank. When Frank asks him why he’s willing to help his response was “because it’s the right thing to do, isn’t that why you’re dong it?” when Frank goes to see him for their appointment to figure everything out for court he is nowhere to be found. Concannon must have bribed him to disappear, which doesn’t go with doing the right thing.

Archbishop Brophy takes a Utilitarian position in the movie. Bishop Brophy is in charge of the Archdiocese of Boston who runs the church. His only concern is for the reputation of the hospital. He doesn’t want embarrassment to happen so he wants to settle
Show More

Related Documents: The Verdict Ethics Essay

Case Study Essay

Utilitarian ethics? Why or why not? No, because the verdict was not good for everyone as a whole and based on this ethic the verdict benefitted Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart only. These women were in no form or shape compensated for how they were under paid etc. and this brought on more feelings of worthlessness and unfair conditions for the women who already felt things were not fair at their place of employment from the beginning. 3. Is the decision a moral one pursuant to Kantian ethics? Why or why…

Words 408 - Pages 2

Congressional Ethics Violations

Congressional Ethics. Identify one (1) member of Congress who has been charged with ethics violations. Briefly discuss the reason for the charges and provide two (2) reasons why you agree or disagree with the verdict and any penalties. Provide examples to support your answer. Note: Consider how the verdict and penalties impacts your trust of the members of Congress. In 2005 the FBI videotaped Congressman William Jefferson, a Democrat from Louisiana receiving cash bribes from an FBI informant. After…

Words 711 - Pages 3

Comparing Brands And T. J. Jackson Lear

Charles S. Maier’s writing about drawing a moral bottom line when rendering a historical verdict is very intriguing. It would require to historians to write about past events and people in a way in which morals and ethics play a large part in their writing styles. This would be a significant change for some, one they may not be comfortable with. Many historians feel they can deliver a verdict within their writing without having to incorporate a moral bottom line. However, there are others who believe…

Words 1537 - Pages 7

Week Five Debate Paper

world would halt for this case. Starting when the news was reported in Florida, then to the nation, and finishing with a not guilty verdict from the courts. The question asked now “is the Zimmerman case is over?” Should the prosecutors face ethics charges for bringing the case in the first place? Many people feel the prosecutors should be charged for Ethics violations, but they will not. The prosecution chose to take this case and go to court with the assistance of the media enhanced public…

Words 2322 - Pages 10

Supreme Court Case Brady V. Maryland (1963)

The Prosecutors have a number of specific ethical obligations in addition to the prosecutorial duty to seek. When handling evidence, they have to reveal that evidence because it is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution. There is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information (www.americanbar.org). One example, provided from the textbooks is a Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland (1963). The prosecutor is required to hand over the defense exculpatory…

Words 291 - Pages 2

Notes On Court Systems And Jurisdiction

Outline No. One Court Systems and Jurisdiction * State, District of Columbia, and Territory Court Systems * Limited-Jurisdiction Trial Courts * Hear matters of specialized or limited nature * Traffic courts, juvenile courts, etc. * Small Claims Courts are offshoot of this * General-Jurisdiction Trial Courts (Courts of Record) * Testimony and evidence recorded and stored * Felonies, civil cases over certain $ amounts…

Words 1980 - Pages 8

Shawshank Redemption Ethics Essay

Professional Ethics There are several examples of professional ethics in The Shawshank Redemption. Any criminal justice professional must remain neutral towards criminals. This professional must not show either a positive or negative attitude toward defendants or suspects; it does not matter what the public servant personally thinks about these people. In the movie we can see that during the court hearing, before the judge pronounces the verdict for Andy Dufresne, his honor gives comments from the…

Words 617 - Pages 3

Peanut Corporation Of America Essay

tortfeasers, they were involved in a tort. Which generally means the wrong they have done, has harmed another persons’, physical, emotional and in this case health of another. Personally to me, probably the most running issue in this case is the morals and ethics of this company. They had none. They chose greed over what was morally right. Not to mention any food corporation has a social responsibility to its people to protect them. In every business regardless of what they do or say, they have a responsibility…

Words 513 - Pages 3

Tuskegee Syphilis Study Summary

men and out of these men, 399 had syphilis while 201 did not have syphilis. As compensation for their participation in this study, the men received free meals, free medical examinations and burial insurance. This paper is my analysis of the research ethics of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice Respect for persons , beneficence and justice are basic ethical principles that were violated during the Tuskegee Syphilis Study…

Words 563 - Pages 3

TKAM ESSAY

shut my eyes. Judge Taylor was pulling the jury: “Guilty… guilty… guilty… guilty…” I peeked at Jem: His hands were white from gripping the balcony rail, and his shoulders jerked as if each “guilty” was a separate stab between them” (282). After the verdict, Tom’s supporters were…

Words 623 - Pages 3