Theory Vs Utilitarianism

Words: 571
Pages: 3

What is a theory?
A theory is an organized set of concepts that explains a phenomenon or set of phenomena.
The goal of a theory
To provide general explanation for phenomena
What are the components of a theory?
Premise- A reason put forth in argument to support a claim or conclusion. Conclusion- The result of an argument, or what the argument seeks to establish.
Using one of the theories presented in the textbook, identify two of the components and describe the relationship between them
Utilitarianism argues that, given a set of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice (premise). Utilitarianism believes that it gives us what seems to be a clear and fairly easy principle to apply to ethical problems and so determine the right thing to do in specific cases. It also seems to be an idea that appeals to common sense and is often regarded, therefore, as one that most people use even when
…show more content…
What is evidence or data? Where does evidence/data come from? What role does evidence/data play in understanding a theory? Using one of the theories presented in the textbook, describe what sort of data might be useful in testing this theory. How might you collect this data?
In order to know if a theory is valid, would be to test it. Evidence is the proof that supports the claim in a particular argument. Evidence or data can come from multiple sources which actually strengthens a person stance in the argument. Data collected from experiments or surveys would be useful in utilitarianism
Contrast a theory from a personal belief. What are the practical uses for a theory, and what are the practical uses for beliefs? Which is more likely to represent a bias, a theory or a belief? Using one of the theories presented in the textbook, explain how the theory differs from personal beliefs. Offer examples of personal beliefs that contrast with the components of the