The law doesn't just affect the education for women but men too. If there is a men's sport then there must be a counterpart for women, if there is a women's sport then there must be a counterpart for men. "Although the NCAA fought the application of Title IX to sports as "disruptive, often destructive, and surely counterproductive," the Department of Health, Education and Welfare promulgated regulations requiring that men's and women's athletic budgets must be proportional to the number of participants," (Hickok). Not only should women have the rights to an equal education in sports but men deserve that too because men are no more deserving than women and women are no more deserving than men. "Many colleges merged their women's and women's athletic departments, usually under the control of a male athletic director, and the number of male coaches in charge of women's teams increased as programs went big-time," (Hickok). When the law was passed it was not to just affect women but also men, and so both sexes should rightly have the chance in a good education. In the actual law, it continues to talk about how both men and women should have the equal rights. "Thanks to the passing of this law, men who wish to participate in cheer leading, volleyball, or even figure skating are now able to follow their dreams, much like women who fantasize about playing basketball or …show more content…
Coming with every law, there are always the ups and downs. With increasing opportunities, the budget would have to almost double to compensate for both men and women. With every men's department, there would have to be a women's department. Often most schools cannot take loads of uprising cost to support both growing men and women departments they must cut back on other activities to support the sports. Also, most of the coaching jobs would not be handed to women some of the opportunities still are not equal. "According to the Women's Sports Foundation (WSF), about 45 percent of the head coaches in Woman's sports now are men," (Hickok). The law passed granted men and women the ability to excel in education no matter the gender, but it didn't grant equality in coaching