This covers various angles, including the legal status of college athletes as employees, unionization efforts, the impact of title IX, and the economics of college sports. It sheds light on the power dynamics within power five football in men’s basketball programs, highlighting the exploitation of profit athletes amidst a backdrop of paternalism, patriarchy, and radicalization. I will incorporate Southhall’s insight into discussing the NCAA’s approach to compensation and working conditions for college athletes. Diving into Southall’s analysis of power dynamics within high revenue sports programs. Emphasizing the exploration of athletes within a broader context of paternalism, patriarchy, and radicalization in college sports. Many sides argue whether college athletes should be paid. This article is from Grand Canyon University. Should College Athletes Be Paid? explores the debate surrounding whether college athletes should be paid, presenting arguments both for and against compensation. It highlights the NCAA’s regulations, including the prohibition of salaries for college athletes and restrictions on name, image, and likeness (NIL) compensation. The piece discusses the benefits college athletes receive, such as scholarships and opportunities for skill development, alongside concerns about detracting from the academic mission college athletes face, including physical harm and the demanding schedules resembling full-time jobs. Furthermore, it examines the financial aspects of college sports, emphasizing the significant revenues they generate and questioning whether athletes should share in these profits. In the cbs.com news article Former kicker for the UCF Knights Donald De La Haye was